[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] Commentary about PGP / GPG key generation...
- Subject: [ale] Commentary about PGP / GPG key generation...
- From: mike at trausch.us (Michael B. Trausch)
- Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 13:45:35 -0500
- In-reply-to: <CAEo=5Pxp4wYgFQ9JAXuBAWFc9Sen+TozAB0nGUQuwiDhJe1Naw@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAEo=5Pxp4wYgFQ9JAXuBAWFc9Sen+TozAB0nGUQuwiDhJe1Naw@mail.gmail.com>
On 11/30/2011 01:36 PM, Jim Kinney wrote:
> a certain gov group once required signed emails but also required the
> pub keys NOT be published on a keyserver "for security reasons" but be
> _emailed_ instead along with an attachment that was a scan of the sender
> drivers license.
Say WUT?
--- Mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 729 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://mail.ale.org/pipermail/ale/attachments/20111130/9d08c12d/attachment.bin