[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] Onboard RAID
- Subject: [ale] Onboard RAID
- From: cfowler at outpostsentinel.com (Chris Fowler)
- Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 18:12:51 -0500
- In-reply-to: <CAEo=5Pz7yjL75sfrWMXwbag3_t8fCePavHs0+m_S6D-JviYQ9g@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAJKW_Y6Qj7YC0Xq_W3yPrt94SHRvZnWtBg1O9coKUptMLjF3Cw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAJKW_Y5O0jYk-gsAqrbA4Y=SSbMiu42MrCJ_qKymJzpCoTGQKA@mail.gmail.com> <1321482476.18090.295.camel@dellberry> <CAEo=5Pz7yjL75sfrWMXwbag3_t8fCePavHs0+m_S6D-JviYQ9g@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 17:41 -0500, Jim Kinney wrote:
> It may be only 10 users, but they NEED that data :-)
Ditto.
This is a pet peeve of mine.
Price is what you pay value is what you get.
It does not matter if you pay $5 for the server, but the raid solution
cost $100. All that matters is the value. How valuable is the data?
What will be lost if the data is lost?
People assume that if it is a 5 user system or if the solution only cost
$10 that a $100 add-on is "too expensive" for that. The equate the cost
of the solution to relate to the cost of the add-on. Nada. All that
matters is the value.