[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[ale] [TOTALLY F'ING OT] Re: .NET considered harmful

Subject: [ale] [TOTALLY F'ING OT] Re: .NET considered harmful
From: mike at trausch.us (Michael B. Trausch)
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 16:51:17 -0400
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <1301439076.1913.357.camel@cfowler-desktop> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <1301579284.1601.37.camel@dam-main> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <1301594590.1601.52.camel@dam-main> <[email protected]> <1301602041.1601.69.camel@dam-main> <[email protected]> <1301602917.1601.83.camel@dam-main> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 16:49 -0400, Jim Kinney wrote:
> my bad

I don't think anyone filters out "[TOTALLY F'ING OT]". ;-)

	--- Mike

Follow-Ups:
- [ale] [TOTALLY F'ING OT] Re: .NET considered harmful
  - From: nym.bnm at gmail.com (Brian MacLeod)

References:
- [ale] .NET considered harmful
  - From: hooterpincher at gmail.com (Charles Shapiro)
- [ale] .NET considered harmful
  - From: hooterpincher at gmail.com (Charles Shapiro)
- [ale] .NET considered harmful
  - From: charriglists at bellsouth.net (Calvin Harrigan)
- [ale] .NET considered harmful
  - From: cfowler at outpostsentinel.com (Chris Fowler)
- [ale] .NET considered harmful
  - From: charriglists at bellsouth.net (Calvin Harrigan)
- [ale] .NET considered harmful
  - From: Richard at Bronosky.com (Richard Bronosky)
- [ale] .NET considered harmful
  - From: nym.bnm at gmail.com (Brian MacLeod)
- [ale] .NET considered harmful
  - From: doug.mcnash at gmail.com (Doug McNash)
- [ale] .NET considered harmful
  - From: jim.kinney at gmail.com (Jim Kinney)
- [ale] .NET considered harmful
  - From: damon at damtek.com (Damon L. Chesser)
- [ale] .NET considered harmful
  - From: jim.kinney at gmail.com (Jim Kinney)
- [ale] .NET considered harmful
  - From: lists at serioustechnology.com (Geoffrey Myers)
- [ale] .NET considered harmful
  - From: jim.kinney at gmail.com (Jim Kinney)
- [ale] .NET considered harmful
  - From: lists at serioustechnology.com (Geoffrey Myers)
- [ale] .NET considered harmful
  - From: damon at damtek.com (Damon L. Chesser)
- [ale] .NET considered harmful
  - From: mike at trausch.us (Michael B. Trausch)
- [ale] .NET considered harmful
  - From: damon at damtek.com (Damon L. Chesser)
- [ale] .NET considered harmful
  - From: lists at serioustechnology.com (Geoffrey Myers)
- [ale] .NET considered harmful
  - From: damon at damtek.com (Damon L. Chesser)
- [ale] .NET considered harmful
  - From: mike at trausch.us (Michael B. Trausch)
- [ale] .NET considered harmful
  - From: ale at pcartwright.com (Paul Cartwright)
- [ale] [TOTALLY F'ING OT] Re: .NET considered harmful
  - From: jim.kinney at gmail.com (Jim Kinney)

Prev by Date: [ale] .NET considered harmful
Next by Date: [ale] perl/postgresql question
Previous by thread: [ale] [TOTALLY F'ING OT] Re: .NET considered harmful
Next by thread: [ale] [TOTALLY F'ING OT] Re: .NET considered harmful
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread