[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[ale] .NET considered harmful

Subject: [ale] .NET considered harmful
From: cluon at geeklabs.com (Mike Harrison)
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 16:45:45 -0400 (EDT)
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On Tue, 29 Mar 2011, Jim Kinney wrote:

> I replied that I can replace windows with linux faster
> than their windows admin can stop me.

Snort!

May I steal/borrow/plagerize that line with permission, please. :)

Follow-Ups:
- [ale] .NET considered harmful
  - From: jim.kinney at gmail.com (Jim Kinney)

References:
- [ale] .NET considered harmful
  - From: hooterpincher at gmail.com (Charles Shapiro)
- [ale] .NET considered harmful
  - From: brian.schenken at gmail.com (brian.schenken at gmail.com)
- [ale] .NET considered harmful
  - From: ale-at-ale.org at unpopularminds.org (Don Lachlan)
- [ale] .NET considered harmful
  - From: brian.schenken at gmail.com (Brian Schenken)
- [ale] .NET considered harmful
  - From: Richard at Bronosky.com (Richard Bronosky)
- [ale] .NET considered harmful
  - From: jim.kinney at gmail.com (Jim Kinney)

Prev by Date: [ale] [OT] rant - decadence in society - DRM
Next by Date: [ale] CLEAR wireless on Linux?
Previous by thread: [ale] .NET considered harmful
Next by thread: [ale] .NET considered harmful
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread