[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] veteran unix admin
- Subject: [ale] veteran unix admin
- From: mike at trausch.us (Michael B. Trausch)
- Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 13:02:48 -0500
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]>
On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 11:20 -0500, Jim Kinney wrote:
> Um. yeah. Like the poster "Peters Laws of the Sociopathic
> Obsessive-Compulsive" I'm afraid to ever let a shrink see this list as
> well.
Wow. "We don't use sudo"? Seriously? It is a "crutch for the timid"?
I am the sole administrator on a lot of the machines that I manage (not
all of them, but many of them). I _still_ use sudo for everything that
I have to run as root, for no other reason than software can do
unexpected things, I can make typos, and I want to know what happened
and when it happened. I use it for delegating privileges out to others
that may need to do a one-off thing here and there (such as reset
passwords, for example).
Now, I'm not saying that I've never used "sudo -s" or "sudo -i" (though
I usually add -u and another target user, I nearly never grab a root
shell that way), but yeesh.
I remember people at AT&T crabbing in the mid 2000s because they had
this newfangled "Sue Dough" thing, and they were like "why would we ever
need anything other than "su -"?
Hrm. I wonder if this guy works for AT&T...
--- Mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://mail.ale.org/pipermail/ale/attachments/20110215/e7b0a3a9/attachment.bin