[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[ale] Well isn't this special

Subject: [ale] Well isn't this special
From: ale at pcartwright.com (Paul Cartwright)
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 05:47:54 -0400
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On Mon September 27 2010, Jim Kinney wrote:
> It seems aimed at encrypted services like crackberry email. But I'm sure
> that will get expanded into _all_ encrypted protocols (https, TLS, VPN
> technologies, etc

I do not believe gpg has a backdoor, so if I encrypt an email using pgp/gnupg 
I don't think they can break it. Isn't that why they created pgp/gnupg? I 
mean, besides signing emails..

-- 
Paul Cartwright
Registered Linux user # 367800
Registered Ubuntu User #12459
http://usdebtclock.org/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.ale.org/pipermail/ale/attachments/20100928/937dad65/attachment.bin

Follow-Ups:
- [ale] Well isn't this special
  - From: jim.kinney at gmail.com (Jim Kinney)

References:
- [ale] Well isn't this special
  - From: krwatson at cc.gatech.edu (Watson, Keith)
- [ale] Well isn't this special
  - From: greg.freemyer at gmail.com (Greg Freemyer)
- [ale] Well isn't this special
  - From: jim.kinney at gmail.com (Jim Kinney)

Prev by Date: [ale] SSH Cisco Networking Issue
Next by Date: [ale] OT-related-Re: Well isn't this special
Previous by thread: [ale] Well isn't this special
Next by thread: [ale] Well isn't this special
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread