[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] OT: How different is z/OS from Linux/Unix?
- Subject: [ale] OT: How different is z/OS from Linux/Unix?
- From: m.perry.wright at gmail.com (Mark Wright)
- Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2010 21:16:26 -0500
- In-reply-to: <1267764655.21174.5.camel@telcontar>
- References: <1267764655.21174.5.camel@telcontar>
OS/360 became OS/370 which became OS/390 which became zOS. I think
OS/360 was based on earlier platforms that were not considered
"mainframes". I learned to write 360/370 machine code back in late
80's to diagnose the hardware. Only IBM writes MVS code but I think
people that call themselves MVS programmers write JCL (job control
language) and know how to install and maintain MVS.
I used to know some guys who could look at the 1 and 0's that were
saved at each clock cycle in the cpus and tell you what operation the
computer was doing and if it was working. Still blows my mind.
Mark Wright
m.perry.wright at gmail.com
On Mar 4, 2010, at 11:50 PM, wolf at wolfhalton.info wrote:
> It is difficult to get IBM mainframes to play with, but I want to
> at least see z/OS at some point. I have seen a little of MVS and
> fellow list-member Mr Bass has told me about MVS on Linux, which we
> have messed with but I (at least) haven't gotten to work. z/OS is
> a more recent development from OS/390 (or is it OS/360?). Any ideas?
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.ale.org/pipermail/ale/attachments/20100307/c7b70dd2/attachment.html