[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] tty1 vs tty2,3,4,etc
- Subject: [ale] tty1 vs tty2,3,4,etc
- From: mike at trausch.us (Michael Trausch)
- Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 12:18:17 -0400
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]>
On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 10:34 -0400, Jim Kinney wrote:
> what is special about tty1? In Fedora 12 I have turned on Magic SysRq.
> This allows me to press alt-sysrq-k and slaughter everything running
> on a tty. Works fine for tty2+ but causes a system panic and hard
> crash on tty1.
>
> Is init hard bound to tty1?
At the very least, upstart does not hold a tty while running:
mbt at fennel:~$ ps -eaf|grep init
root 1 0 1 12:14 ? 00:00:02 /sbin/init
lsof also doesn't show any TTY lines open from the process. However,
when it starts, if memory serves, /dev/console is the TTY line in use.
If that eventually becomes tty1, that _might_ explain the behavior that
you're seeing.
--- Mike
--
Even if their crude and anticompetitive business practices don't make
you think about using their software, their use of sweatshops and child
labor should: boycott Microsoft like you would any other amoral child
abuser: http://is.gd/btW8m
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://mail.ale.org/pipermail/ale/attachments/20100608/bd94ecc2/attachment.bin
- Prev by Date:
[ale] tty1 vs tty2,3,4,etc
- Next by Date:
[ale] tty1 vs tty2,3,4,etc
- Previous by thread:
[ale] tty1 vs tty2,3,4,etc
- Next by thread:
[ale] tty1 vs tty2,3,4,etc
- Index(es):