[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] Fw: VirtualBox
- Subject: [ale] Fw: VirtualBox
- From: cfowler at outpostsentinel.com (Chris Fowler)
- Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 11:15:29 -0500
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <1128437932-1292423809-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-925124460-@bda650.bisx.prod.on.blackberry> <[email protected]> <1896368331-1292425485-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1897010817-@bda650.bisx.prod.on.blackberry> <[email protected]>
On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 11:00 -0500, John wrote:
> On a server, I wouldn't run VirtualBox. I had stability issues with
> it
> over the summer. If you are doing Linux-only virtualization, KVM is a
> good alternative. It may be good for mixed virtualization
> environments
> too, I just don't do that. For that "other OS", I've used ESX or
> ESXi.
Agreed.
VB works fine for me to run XP so that I can do Webex but I use Vmware
for production.