[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] ubuntu versus fedora
- Subject: [ale] ubuntu versus fedora
- From: mike at trausch.us (Michael Trausch)
- Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 11:54:46 -0400
- In-reply-to: <1271514511.2073.15.camel@telcontar>
- References: <[email protected]> <1271514511.2073.15.camel@telcontar>
On Sat, 2010-04-17 at 10:28 -0400, wolf at wolfhalton.info wrote:
> My web server is running on CentOS. If I ever bring it in-house, I am
> probably going to try using Debian instead, but just because I like
> the Ubuntu updater better than yum.
You might also consider an LTS release of Ubuntu Server; they support
direct upgrades from one to the other. I have been using a mixture of
those and regular releases on servers, depending on the server's task.
I often need to use virtualization like KVM or what-not, so those are
the systems that I use.
When FreeBSD actually supports system virtualization or
paravirtualization (? la KVM or Xen) as a host system, I will likely be
running that, because most of the things that I do could be done just
fine on FreeBSD, but there are always a few things that I need a system
running Linux for---but Linux systems stink at containerization for the
time being. LXC isn't rock-solid yet, and OpenVZ requires massively
out-of-date kernels, and I just don't _like_ running full VMs when I
don't actually need them.
--- Mike
--
Even if their crude and anticompetitive business practices don't make
you think about using their software, their use of sweatshops and child
labor should: boycott Microsoft like you would any other amoral child
abuser: http://is.gd/btW8m