[ale] SNAT issues

[cfowler at outpostsentinel.com (Chris Fowler)]

On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 10:19 -0600, JK wrote:
> Chris Fowler wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 11:08 -0400, Jim Kinney wrote:
> >> docs are correct. They are for DNAT not SNAT.
> > 
> > The last example on that page shows a SNAT rule.  Is that syntax wrong?
> 
> 
> I think it is.  I tripped over this same issue a while back.  I believe some
> older versions of iptables (et al) accepted --to-destination as a SNAT
> option, but that has apparently changed.
> 

Thanks.

Good thing I tested it before doing a cvs tag.