[ale] Borland (was Xen)

[greg.freemyer at gmail.com (Greg Freemyer)]

That signs been there for years, but I still don't know what they do these days.

On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Jeff Lightner<jlightner at water.com> wrote:
> What does Borland do these days?? A year or so ago they put their name on
> top of a building near the NW I-285/I-75 Cobb Cloverleaf.
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: ale-bounces at ale.org [mailto:ale-bounces at ale.org] On Behalf Of Asher
> Vilensky
> Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 12:33 PM
> To: Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts - Yes! We run Linux!
> Subject: Re: [ale] Xen
>
>
>
> It's funny to me to read "Borland" and "smart" in the same sentence.? At the
> time, they brought an entire dev team from Russia to Atlanta - only to lay
> everybody off a month or two later.? Saw it with my own two eyes.
>
> -- Asher Vilensky
> ? ashervilensky at gmail.com
> ? Home: 404-377-8434
> ? Cell: 404 452 8642
>
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Jeff Lightner <jlightner at water.com> wrote:
>
> If they?d been smart they?d have done what Borland did after they bought
> dBaseII way back when and already owned Paradox.? They?d just issue updates
> to both products so they were exactly alike.? Doing it this way just annoys
> your install base who say to themselves:? ?If I?ve got to migrate why
> migrate to something these putzes make ? might as well do something else.?
> Then again many vendors will create a ?migration path? before dumping stuff.
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: ale-bounces at ale.org [mailto:ale-bounces at ale.org] On Behalf Of Brian
> Pitts
> Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 11:28 AM
> To: Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts - Yes! We run Linux!
> Subject: Re: [ale] Xen
>
>
>
> On 06/23/2009 07:49 AM, Jeff Lightner wrote:
>
> Right but it goes on to say they?re folding it into their own Oracle VM and
> that both were based on Xen.
>
>
>
> Since I never heard of Virtual Iron before I can?t say much about it.? If it
> was Open Source then they can only quit supporting it themselves without
> killing it.?? However, I wonder if the reason it is being killed isn?t
> because no one ever heard of it and it had an uphill battle against VMWare,
> Xen and other options.
>
> This thread was started by Jim posting old news about Oracle buying Virtual
> Iron. It turned out that within a month of buying them, Oracle fired almost
> everyone and discontinued the project. It seems like a rather expensive way
> to get more customers for your own product.
>
> I am pretty curious to see what happens in the Sun xVM v Oracle VM fight.
>
> All the best,
> Brian Pitts
>
>
>
> Please consider our environment before printing this e-mail or attachments.
>
> ----------------------------------
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail may contain privileged or confidential
> information and is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you are
> not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of
> the contents of this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you
> have received this electronic transmission in error, please reply
> immediately to the sender that you have received the message in error, and
> delete it. Thank you.
> ----------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
>
>



-- 
Greg Freemyer
Head of EDD Tape Extraction and Processing team
Litigation Triage Solutions Specialist
http://www.linkedin.com/in/gregfreemyer
First 99 Days Litigation White Paper -
http://www.norcrossgroup.com/forms/whitepapers/99%20Days%20whitepaper.pdf

The Norcross Group
The Intersection of Evidence & Technology
http://www.norcrossgroup.com