[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[ale] quick and dirty webmail solution?

Subject: [ale] quick and dirty webmail solution?
From: jimpop at gmail.com (Jim Popovitch)
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 17:07:51 -0700
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 15:38, Mike Harrison<meuon at geeklabs.com> wrote:
>
> Squirrelmail is still a useful favorite. Low bandwidth, simple..

Yuck.  PHP sucks.

I've used perl-based NeoMail in the past.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/neomail/

-Jim P.

Follow-Ups:
- [ale] quick and dirty webmail solution?
  - From: meuon at geeklabs.com (Meuon)

References:
- [ale] quick and dirty webmail solution?
  - From: lists at serioustechnology.com (Geoffrey)
- [ale] quick and dirty webmail solution?
  - From: ale at sixit.com (Robert Reese)
- [ale] quick and dirty webmail solution?
  - From: meuon at geeklabs.com (Mike Harrison)

Prev by Date: [ale] Critical JavaScript vulnerability in Firefox 3.5
Next by Date: [ale] quick and dirty webmail solution?
Previous by thread: [ale] quick and dirty webmail solution?
Next by thread: [ale] quick and dirty webmail solution?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread