[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] Why digest mode? (Was: Ale Digest, Vol 15, Issue 89)
- Subject: [ale] Why digest mode? (Was: Ale Digest, Vol 15, Issue 89)
- From: james.sumners at gmail.com (James Sumners)
- Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 00:45:16 -0400
Particularly since it is nigh impossible for those of us that want to
"mute" conversations to do so. Replying to digest mails eliminates the
headers that are associated with a particular thread. So an email
client can't decide if the conversation has been killed or not.
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 12:14 AM, Jim Popovitch <jimpop at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 21:07, Ryan Marshall <rymarshall at gmail.com> wrote:
>> The next time I have something on topic to share, I'll chime in.? Until
>> then, I'm just enjoying reading and learning a lot about my OS of choice.
>
> In the mean time.... why Digest mode? ?I've often wondered why people
> use Digest mode these days.
>
> Thanks for any insight.
>
> -Jim P.
--
James Sumners
http://james.roomfullofmirrors.com/
"All governments suffer a recurring problem: Power attracts
pathological personalities. It is not that power corrupts but that it
is magnetic to the corruptible. Such people have a tendency to become
drunk on violence, a condition to which they are quickly addicted."
Missionaria Protectiva, Text QIV (decto)
CH:D 59