[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] [OT] Help with Significant Figures Explaination
- Subject: [ale] [OT] Help with Significant Figures Explaination
- From: ecashin at noserose.net (Ed Cashin)
- Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 14:33:23 -0400
- In-reply-to: <1224262682.5388.8.camel@stout>
- References: <[email protected]> <1224262682.5388.8.camel@stout>
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 12:58 PM, Jim Kinney <jim.kinney at gmail.com> wrote:
...
> The definition I was taught and still use is the least significant digit
> is 1/2 the smallest MARKED unit on the measuring device. So a meter
> stick marked to the millimeter is good to .5mm. By eye, a reasonable
> person can decide if something is closer to 1mm or 2mm but judging
> beyond that is too imprecise.
I think that's the working definition I learned in high school.
It seems reasonable, practical, and easy to justify.
Do you know of any authoritative source that popularized
this way of thinking about significant digits? I don't know
whether my teachers cited an authority. I think they just
presented it as self evident.
--
Ed Cashin <ecashin at noserose.net>