[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[ale] Ongoing vim vs. emacs

Subject: [ale] Ongoing vim vs. emacs
From: ale_nospam at fayettedigital.com (Jim Lynch)
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 06:33:30 -0400
In-reply-to: <20080621231901.RDHU2.383001.root@fepweb06>
References: <20080621231901.RDHU2.383001.root@fepweb06>

dmcnash at charter.net wrote:
> I could use them - I build tube audio amps.
> --
>
>   
I do too, well amps, not necessarily audio.  But I don't suppose there 
are any 572B, 4CX1000, 811, 3-500Z or 833s in there?

Jim.

Follow-Ups:
- [ale] Ongoing vim vs. emacs
  - From: jim.kinney at gmail.com (Jim Kinney)

References:
- [ale] Ongoing vim vs. emacs
  - From: dmcnash at charter.net (dmcnash at charter.net)

Prev by Date: [ale] Notes from Jun 19th meeting
Next by Date: [ale] Ongoing vim vs. emacs
Previous by thread: [ale] Ongoing vim vs. emacs
Next by thread: [ale] Ongoing vim vs. emacs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread