[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] Ongoing vim vs. emacs
- Subject: [ale] Ongoing vim vs. emacs
- From: pete.hardie at gmail.com (Pete Hardie)
- Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 14:19:20 -0400
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]>
2008/6/3 Jeff Lightner <jlightner at water.com>:
> New article out about something called cream to make vim easier for new
> users (maybe even the emacs folks that can't figure it out):
>
> http://www.linux-mag.com/id/6045/
>
> I like this from the article:
>
> "Vim has a tremendous amount of power, stability, and extensibility to offer
> users (Emacs? ahhh, not so much)"
>
> Let the flames begin?
Interesting. While I'm a hardcore vi/vim fan, I've never seen anyone
claim emacs was *less* powerful and extendable
than anything else. Emacs just lets you extend it yourself until
you've overextended yourself.
>
> J
>
> ----------------------------------
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail may contain privileged or confidential
> information and is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you are
> not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of
> the contents of this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you
> have received this electronic transmission in error, please reply
> immediately to the sender that you have received the message in error, and
> delete it. Thank you.
> ----------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
>
>
--
Pete Hardie
--------
Better Living Through Bitmaps