[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] AT&T blocking 25
- Subject: [ale] AT&T blocking 25
- From: nedj10 at gmail.com (Ned Williams)
- Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 13:40:08 -0400
- In-reply-to: <1208366176.9341.26.camel@cfowler-laptop>
- References: <1208366176.9341.26.camel@cfowler-laptop>
most people get around the 25 block by using smtp-auth on 587
Ned
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Christopher Fowler <
cfowler at outpostsentinel.com> wrote:
> We are back up in our office on AT&T and they are blocking 25. I
> thought maybe specifying their server as a smart relay would work but it
> does not.
>
> I have a sendmail server in our datacenter that requires authentication.
> I would like it to be my smart relay for our office.
>
> I've added an iptables rule on that server to route port 26 -> 25. From
> evolution I can send mail and I'm authenticating fine. I need to
> program one of our servers to use that machine as a smart relay. Would
> it be required to auth too?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.ale.org/pipermail/ale/attachments/20080416/3c58f3d1/attachment.html