[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] Open-source software license manager
- Subject: [ale] Open-source software license manager
- From: kafka at antichri.st (George Carless)
- Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 13:46:36 -0400
- In-reply-to: <1182533163.18661.3.camel@localhost>
- References: <1338588992.1182478440055.JavaMail.root@fepweb01> <1182485905.17510.6.camel@localhost> <[email protected]> <1182522280.8986.11.camel@localhost> <[email protected]> <1182533163.18661.3.camel@localhost>
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 01:26:03PM -0400, Jim Popovitch wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 12:57 -0400, George Carless wrote:
> > Well, license management typically implies restrictions on use which are
> > antithetical to the nature of free software, right?
>
> I think you are misguided. "Free" has many facets. Even the GPL, from
> certain angles, limits your "freedom".
I'm not especially interested in getting into a terminology war,
here, but I do think that it's pretty evident that license
management software is at odds with virtually every facet of
"freedom" that is out there: if the software is free only as in
beer, why would license management be required? If it's free as in
free to modify etc., what use would such license management really
be? Perhaps you can provide an example of where you think license
management *would* be both compatible (and sensible/necessary) with
free software, for whatever reasonable definition of 'free' you
like--because I can't think of one.
Regards,
--George
--------------------------------------
George Carless ... kafka at antichri.st
Words are just dust in deserts of sound