[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[ale] OT Re[2]: Is this for Real

Subject: [ale] OT Re[2]: Is this for Real
From: ale at sixit.com (Robert Reese)
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 13:00:53 -0400
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

*********** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***********
On 4/13/2007 at 7:48 AM Christopher Fowler wrote:

>On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 01:54 -0400, Robert Reese wrote:
>> a remote control.
>
>What that remote connected via a little wire or was it wireless?

It was expensive as hell.  And wireless, though it didn't work if it was more than 6 feet away from the box.

R~

------------------------------------------------------
   * Microsoft is NOT a standard. *
------------------------------------------------------

References:
- [ale] Is this for Real
  - From: j9916moore at bellsouth.net (Jim Moore)
- [ale] Is this for Real
  - From: James.Taylor at eastcobbgroup.com (James Taylor)
- [ale] Is this for Real
  - From: j9916moore at bellsouth.net (Jim Moore)
- [ale] Is this for Real
  - From: danverde at comcast.net (danverde)
- [ale] Is this for Real
  - From: cfowler at outpostsentinel.com (Christopher Fowler)
- [ale] Is this for Real
  - From: jlightner at water.com (Jeff Lightner)
- [ale] OT Re[2]: Is this for Real
  - From: ale at sixit.com (Robert Reese)
- [ale] OT Re[2]: Is this for Real
  - From: cfowler at outpostsentinel.com (Christopher Fowler)

Prev by Date: [ale] OT Re[2]: Is this for Real
Next by Date: [ale] OT Re[2]: Is this for Real
Previous by thread: [ale] OT Re[2]: Is this for Real
Next by thread: [ale] Is this for Real
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread