[ale] OT: AMD Athlon 64

[hbbs at comcast.net (Jeff Hubbs)]

There's more to the x86/AMD64 jump than just the 32/64 bits.  My AMD64 
Mobile 3000+ at 1.8GHz actually isn't tremendously slower than the 
3.2GHz P4 HT that I had at my most recent job on things like compiling 
in part because of the AMD64's additional registers. 

My latest box - which I haven't had time to power up yet - is an AMD64 
X2 4200+ from HP and, being a Gentooista, it will be doing lots and lots 
of compiles.  But, I also expect to be running Xen VMs, doing 
audio/video processing, and a fair amount of GIMP.

- Jeff

Jesse M. Holmes wrote:

>What about processing speed? I have a 1.8Ghz here at home. That means it
>should be twice as fast a 900Mhz processor, and six times as fast as the
>computer I had before it. AMD's dual cores start at 1.8 and go to 2.6.
>While 2.6 is a big jump from 1.8, it's not double. A 1.8 should be able
>to run anything you would be doing at home unless you're a homegrown
>nuclear physicist. So why do people spend tons more on faster processors
>if their biggest challenge of the day is Microsoft Office and Half Life
>2? Do they receive any noticeable benefits, or is it all part of that
>new car syndrome?
>
>Jesse M. Holmes
>
>_______________________________________________
>Ale mailing list
>Ale at ale.org
>http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
>
>  
>