[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain -->
- <!--x-date: Wed May 25 20:47:14 2005 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: wxvaarl ng ybpnyargfbyhgvbaf.pbz (Xnzrf B. Yvaarl WWW) -->
- <!--x-message-id: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: 20050525205307.BEDJ11479.ibm56aec.bellsouth.net@win2kpro1 --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-subject: [ale] NIC troubles -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Wed May 25 20:47:14 2005</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: jkinney at localnetsolutions.com (James P. Kinney III)</li>
- <li><em>in-reply-to</em>: <20050525205307.BEDJ11479.ibm56aec.bellsouth.net@win2kpro1></li>
- <li><em>references</em>: <20050525205307.BEDJ11479.ibm56aec.bellsouth.net@win2kpro1></li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] NIC troubles</li>
I have hit that same issue. The solution is the restart all of
networking. I don't know why ifconfig eth0:1 up won't work with virtual
interfaces. It just won't.
>
> OS: RHEL ES3
>
> Thank you.
> -Ryan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dow Hurst [<a rel="nofollow" href="mailto:Dow.Hurst";>mailto:Dow.Hurst</a> at mindspring.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 20, 2005 4:08 PM
> To: FishR at bellsouth.net; Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts
> Subject: Re: [ale] NIC troubles
>
> If you take eth0:0 down does eth1 still give errors and collisions?
> And, vice versa? Let's prove your interfaces are working separately
> without problems first.
> Dow
>
>
> Ryan Fish wrote:
>
> >Hello all,
> >
> >After completing a server move from one DC to another I have been putting
> out small fires. This one, though, has left me scratching my head so far...
> >
> >OS: RHEL ES3
> >
> >There are two NICs in this server: one for public and one for private. For
> some reason it appears there is a conflict between the second IP on the
> first NIC (eth0:0) and the only IP on the second NIC (eth1). See below:
> >
> >eth0:0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:0F:1F:04:76:89
> > inet addr:209.168.xxx.xxx Bcast:209.168.xxx.xxx
> Mask:255.255.255.240
> > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> > RX packets:4678729 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> > TX packets:4455288 errors:38 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> > collisions:374563 txqueuelen:1000
> > RX bytes:1819725445 (1735.4 Mb) TX bytes:950192933 (906.1 Mb)
> > Interrupt:16
> >
> >eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:0F:1F:04:76:8A
> > inet addr:192.168.3.xxx Bcast:192.168.3.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
> > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> > RX packets:4678729 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> > TX packets:4455288 errors:38 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> > collisions:374563 txqueuelen:1000
> > RX bytes:1819725445 (1735.4 Mb) TX bytes:950192933 (906.1 Mb)
> > Interrupt:17
> >
> >As can be seen by the MAC addresses these are not the same NIC. However,
> all of the stats (RX/TX/collisions, etc) are exactly the same between them
> while eth0 is behaving nicely.
> >
> >Any suggestions on why this happening and where I should look to correct
> it?
> >
> >Thank you in advance.
> >-Ryan
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Ale mailing list
> >Ale at ale.org
> ><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale";>http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale";>http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>
--
James P. Kinney III \Changing the mobile computing world/
CEO & Director of Engineering \ one Linux user /
Local Net Solutions,LLC \ at a time. /
770-493-8244 \.___________________________./
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.localnetsolutions.com";>http://www.localnetsolutions.com</a>
GPG ID: 829C6CA7 James P. Kinney III (M.S. Physics)
<jkinney at localnetsolutions.com>
Fingerprint = 3C9E 6366 54FC A3FE BA4D 0659 6190 ADC3 829C 6CA7
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00932" href="msg00932.html">[ale] NIC troubles</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> FishR at bellsouth.net (Ryan Fish)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00938.html">[ale] iptables TOS (was: b'bye)</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00940.html">[ale] IMAP Client</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00932.html">[ale] NIC troubles</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00761.html">[ale] Sound of Silence</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00939"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00939"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>