[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-date: Wed May 25 12:39:38 2005 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: fgnynk ng rneguyvax.arg (Xnzrf [pTneynaq) -->
- <!--x-message-id: 218530.1117038588516.JavaMail.root@wamui-lapwing.atl.sa.earthlink.net -->
- <!--x-subject: [ale] multi-processor vs. Tape Drive -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Wed May 25 12:39:38 2005</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: stalax at earthlink.net (James McFarland)</li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] multi-processor vs. Tape Drive</li>
"rmmod st; modprobe st" does not seem to accomplish much.
dmesg output:
st: Unloaded.
st: Version 20041025, fixed bufsize 32768, s/g segs 256
No change in /proc/scsi/scsi or /dev
-James
Robert L. Harris wrote:
>
>Sounds like a bug in the driver code. Are both kernels exactly the
>same?
>
>On the SMP kernel try "rmmod st; modprobe st" and check to see if
>there's any output (check dmesg also).
>
>
>
>Thus spake James McFarland (stalax at earthlink.net):
>
>>When I use "modprobe st "It shows up under lsmod. However, the device (/dev/st0) is not available. Do I need to create it manually? If so, can you point to someplace with the appropriate instructions?
>>
>>It also isn't present under /proc/scsi/scsi:
>>
>>SMP Kernel:
>>[root at pheonix ~]# cat /proc/scsi/scsi
>>Attached devices:
>>Host: scsi0 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 00
>> Vendor: ADAPTEC Model: oldmail-RAID5 Rev: V1.0
>> Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 02
>>
>>
>>SP Kernel:
>>[root at pheonix ~]# cat /proc/scsi/scsi
>>Attached devices:
>>Host: scsi0 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 00
>> Vendor: ADAPTEC Model: oldmail-RAID5 Rev: V1.0
>> Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 02
>>Host: scsi0 Channel: 02 Id: 06 Lun: 00
>> Vendor: QUANTUM Model: DLT VS160 Rev: 2500
>> Type: Sequential-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 02
>>
>>
>>Robert L. Harris wrote:
>>
>>>What happens if you load the SMP kernel and "modprobe st" ?
>>>
>>>
>>>Thus spake James McFarland (stalax at earthlink.net):
>>>
>>>>I hope someone on this list can point me in the right direction.
>>>>
>>>>I am trying to turn an old dual P3 server into a basic fileserver. I added an adaptec 2200s Dual Chanel SCSI Raid Controller. To Chanel 0 I connected 3 drives for a RAID 5. To Chanel 1 I connected an external Tape drive. I then installed Fedora Core 3.
>>>>
>>>>When I use the SMP Kernel, the system cannot find the Tape Drive (lsmod shows st isn't loaded). When I use the single processor kernel, It finds the Tape drive just fine, but I get only one processor. In either case, it sees the RAID array just fine.
>>>>
>>>>I have updated the BIOS on both the motherboard & the SCSI card. Removing the RAID array or changing SCSI channels makes no difference.
>>>>
>>>>It seems to me that there is a difference in the Kernel configuration somewhere. However, my kernel knowledge is limited at best & my initial attempts to locate a meaningful difference have been unsuccessful.
>>>>
>>>>I am running the basic Kernels installed with Core 3 (2.6.11-1.14_FC3).
>>>>
>>>>If anyone can offer a suggestion as to where I should look in my system's configuration, or direct me towards an appropriate net resource I'd really appreciate it.
>>>>
>>>>-James
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>Ale mailing list
>>>>Ale at ale.org
>>>><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale";>http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>
>>>
>>>
>>>:wq!
>>>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>Robert L. Harris | GPG Key ID: E344DA3B
>>> @ x-hkp://pgp.mit.edu
>>>DISCLAIMER:
>>> These are MY OPINIONS With Dreams To Be A King,
>>> ALONE. I speak for First One Should Be A Man
>>> no-one else. - Manowar
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Ale mailing list
>>>Ale at ale.org
>>><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale";>http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>
>>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Ale mailing list
>>Ale at ale.org
>><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale";>http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>
>>
>>
>>
>> ** CRM114 Whitelisted by: mit.edu **
>
>
>:wq!
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Robert L. Harris | GPG Key ID: E344DA3B
> @ x-hkp://pgp.mit.edu
>DISCLAIMER:
> These are MY OPINIONS With Dreams To Be A King,
> ALONE. I speak for First One Should Be A Man
> no-one else. - Manowar
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Ale mailing list
>Ale at ale.org
><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale";>http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>
>
>Ale at ale.org
><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale";>http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>
>
_______________________________________________
Ale mailing list
Ale at ale.org
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale";>http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00923" href="msg00923.html">[ale] multi-processor vs. Tape Drive</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> Robert.L.Harris at rdlg.net (Robert L. Harris)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00921.html">[ale] multi-processor vs. Tape Drive</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00923.html">[ale] multi-processor vs. Tape Drive</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00921.html">[ale] multi-processor vs. Tape Drive</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00923.html">[ale] multi-processor vs. Tape Drive</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00922"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00922"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>