[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain -->
- <!--x-date: Wed May 25 12:14:00 2005 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: Dboreg.Z.Vneevf ng eqyt.arg (Dboreg Z. Vneevf) -->
- <!--x-message-id: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: 14744707.1117036255097.JavaMail.root@wamui-lapwing.atl.sa.earthlink.net --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-subject: [ale] multi-processor vs. Tape Drive -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Wed May 25 12:14:00 2005</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: Robert.L.Harris at rdlg.net (Robert L. Harris)</li>
- <li><em>in-reply-to</em>: <<a href="msg00919.html">14744707.1117036255097.JavaMail.root@wamui-lapwing.atl.sa.earthlink.net</a>></li>
- <li><em>references</em>: <<a href="msg00919.html">14744707.1117036255097.JavaMail.root@wamui-lapwing.atl.sa.earthlink.net</a>></li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] multi-processor vs. Tape Drive</li>
Sounds like a bug in the driver code. Are both kernels exactly the
same?
On the SMP kernel try "rmmod st; modprobe st" and check to see if
there's any output (check dmesg also).
Thus spake James McFarland (stalax at earthlink.net):
>
> When I use "modprobe st "It shows up under lsmod. However, the device (/dev/st0) is not available. Do I need to create it manually? If so, can you point to someplace with the appropriate instructions?
>
> It also isn't present under /proc/scsi/scsi:
>
> SMP Kernel:
> [root at pheonix ~]# cat /proc/scsi/scsi
> Attached devices:
> Host: scsi0 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 00
> Vendor: ADAPTEC Model: oldmail-RAID5 Rev: V1.0
> Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 02
>
>
> SP Kernel:
> [root at pheonix ~]# cat /proc/scsi/scsi
> Attached devices:
> Host: scsi0 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 00
> Vendor: ADAPTEC Model: oldmail-RAID5 Rev: V1.0
> Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 02
> Host: scsi0 Channel: 02 Id: 06 Lun: 00
> Vendor: QUANTUM Model: DLT VS160 Rev: 2500
> Type: Sequential-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 02
>
>
> Robert L. Harris wrote:
>
> >
> >What happens if you load the SMP kernel and "modprobe st" ?
> >
> >
> >Thus spake James McFarland (stalax at earthlink.net):
> >
> >>I hope someone on this list can point me in the right direction.
> >>
> >>I am trying to turn an old dual P3 server into a basic fileserver. I added an adaptec 2200s Dual Chanel SCSI Raid Controller. To Chanel 0 I connected 3 drives for a RAID 5. To Chanel 1 I connected an external Tape drive. I then installed Fedora Core 3.
> >>
> >>When I use the SMP Kernel, the system cannot find the Tape Drive (lsmod shows st isn't loaded). When I use the single processor kernel, It finds the Tape drive just fine, but I get only one processor. In either case, it sees the RAID array just fine.
> >>
> >>I have updated the BIOS on both the motherboard & the SCSI card. Removing the RAID array or changing SCSI channels makes no difference.
> >>
> >>It seems to me that there is a difference in the Kernel configuration somewhere. However, my kernel knowledge is limited at best & my initial attempts to locate a meaningful difference have been unsuccessful.
> >>
> >>I am running the basic Kernels installed with Core 3 (2.6.11-1.14_FC3).
> >>
> >>If anyone can offer a suggestion as to where I should look in my system's configuration, or direct me towards an appropriate net resource I'd really appreciate it.
> >>
> >>-James
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>Ale mailing list
> >>Ale at ale.org
> >><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale";>http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>
> >
> >
> >:wq!
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >Robert L. Harris | GPG Key ID: E344DA3B
> > @ x-hkp://pgp.mit.edu
> >DISCLAIMER:
> > These are MY OPINIONS With Dreams To Be A King,
> > ALONE. I speak for First One Should Be A Man
> > no-one else. - Manowar
> >
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Ale mailing list
> >Ale at ale.org
> ><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale";>http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale";>http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>
>
>
>
> ** CRM114 Whitelisted by: mit.edu **
:wq!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert L. Harris | GPG Key ID: E344DA3B
@ x-hkp://pgp.mit.edu
DISCLAIMER:
These are MY OPINIONS With Dreams To Be A King,
ALONE. I speak for First One Should Be A Man
no-one else. - Manowar
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00919" href="msg00919.html">[ale] multi-processor vs. Tape Drive</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> stalax at earthlink.net (James McFarland)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00919.html">[ale] multi-processor vs. Tape Drive</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00921.html">[ale] multi-processor vs. Tape Drive</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00919.html">[ale] multi-processor vs. Tape Drive</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00921.html">[ale] multi-processor vs. Tape Drive</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00920"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00920"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>