[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain -->
- <!--x-date: Tue May 24 21:12:59 2005 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: wbr ng znqrjryy.pbz (Xbr Egrryr) -->
- <!--x-message-id: Pine.LNX.3.96.1050524201317.18631A-[email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-subject: [ale] Re: Installing j2se on RHEL 3? -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Tue May 24 21:12:59 2005</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: joe at madewell.com (Joe Steele)</li>
- <li><em>in-reply-to</em>: <<a href="msg00889.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] Re: Installing j2se on RHEL 3?</li>
> Michael Hirsch wrote:
> > On 5/24/05, Geoffrey <esoteric at 3times25.net> wrote:
> >
> >>Michael Hirsch wrote:
> >>
> >>>Correction: All references to "less" should have been "tail". RHEL 3
> >>>has a broken tail ;-)
> >>
> >>Then that functionality is not your problem as 'tail' supports both '-'
> >>and '+' switches.
> >
> >
> > I hate to disagree with you, but have you tried RHEL 3 lately? It has
> > been removed on my version.
>
> That's quite interesting. I'm on RHEL 4 now, but just upgraded to 4
> from 3 when 4 came out and I'd swear that at least tail -1 worked. RHEL
> 4 does accept both '-' and '+' switches though.
>
I think this behavior is controllable. A vanilla version of tail (from GNU
coreutils-5.2.1) can be forced to exhibit the 'obsolete' behavior if the
environment contains the variable '_POSIX2_VERSION' set to some value less
than 200112.
I don't know about RHEL, but FC3 uses a modified tail command so that the
only way to get the 'new' behavior is to define '_POSIX2_VERSION' >= 200112
and also define POSIXLY_CORRECT in the environment.
To get the 'obsolete' behavior, I'd suggest trying:
export _POSIX2_VERSION=199209
--Joe
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00904" href="msg00904.html">[ale] Re: Installing j2se on RHEL 3?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> jkinney at localnetsolutions.com (James P. Kinney III)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00906" href="msg00906.html">[ale] Re: Installing j2se on RHEL 3?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> jimpop at yahoo.com (Jim Popovitch)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00889" href="msg00889.html">[ale] Re: Installing j2se on RHEL 3?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> esoteric at 3times25.net (Geoffrey)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00901.html">[ale] b'bye</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00903.html">[ale] tomcat woes</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00894.html">[ale] Re: Installing j2se on RHEL 3?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00904.html">[ale] Re: Installing j2se on RHEL 3?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00902"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00902"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>