[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain -->
- <!--x-date: Thu May 12 14:15:43 2005 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: oevna.fgnanynaq ng tznvy.pbz (Pevna Egnanynaq) -->
- <!--x-message-id: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-subject: [ale] [OT] Big Brother Wins, We lose... From /. Real-ID Passes U.S. Senate 100-0 -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Thu May 12 14:15:43 2005</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: brian.stanaland at gmail.com (Brian Stanaland)</li>
- <li><em>in-reply-to</em>: <<a href="msg00232.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>references</em>: <<a href="msg00171.html">[email protected]</a>> <<a href="msg00221.html">[email protected]</a>> <<a href="msg00224.html">[email protected]</a>> <<a href="msg00232.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] [OT] Big Brother Wins, We lose... From /. Real-ID Passes U.S. Senate 100-0</li>
Brian....
On 5/12/05, ChangingLINKS.com <groups at changinglinks.com> wrote:
> On Thursday May 12 2005 07:53, Geoffrey wrote:
> > ChangingLINKS.com wrote:
> > > Next time, argue that people should use OT in the subject line.
> > > Everyone agrees that the use of [OT] is considerate and allows those not
> > > wishing to see these political threads a way to filter.
> >
> > Better yet, use [PT] 'Political Topic', hence folks who simply aren't
> > interested in building on the flamewar can filter on that.
>
> I vote against the [PT] .
> My thinking is that if we can't get people to USE [OT] consistently, there is
> no way they will remember to use [PT]. I thought that telling people to use
> [OT] would be a solution, BUT then there will be tons of flamewars on what is
> "[OT] or not." A better solution is to charge $1 for failing to use [OT] -
> but again, enforcement of that rule would cause enforcement flamewars. :)
>
> > Seriously,
> > there's never been any productive discussions on politics on this list.
> > Nothing is gained, people just blow the bandwidth.
>
> There IS something gained in these flamewars.
> If there wasn't, they wouldn't happen.
> I can think of numerous benefits off of the top of my head.
>
> Likewise, the "wasting/blowing bandwidth" objection gets repeated everytime a
> discussion is [OT]. The objection is not only invalid, but just as
> "non-productive" as the original thread. Still, apparently there IS a benefit
> for restating the false argument of "saving bandwidth."
>
> Flamewars, Saving bandwidth and other seemingly pointless behaviors will
> always be a part of this list. The "wise" don't participate, post worthless
> objections, or even post objections TO those objections.
> --
> Wishing you Happiness, Joy, and Laughter,
> Drew Brown
> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ChangingLINKS.com">http://www.ChangingLINKS.com</a>
>
> /objection to an objection
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale">http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>
>
--
"Anyone who has the power to make
you believe absurdities has the power
to make you commit atrocities."
-- Voltaire
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00240" href="msg00240.html">[ale] [OT] Big Brother Wins, We lose... From /. Real-ID Passes U.S. Senate 100-0</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> groups at ChangingLINKS.com (ChangingLINKS.com)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00245" href="msg00245.html">[ale] [OT] Big Brother Wins, We lose... From /. Real-ID Passes U.S. Senate 100-0</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> jsheets at yahoo.com (Jerald Sheets)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00171" href="msg00171.html">[ale] Big Brother Wins, We lose... From /. Real-ID Passes U.S. Senate 100-0</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> rsj at radio.org (Randal Jarrett)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00221" href="msg00221.html">[ale] [OT] Big Brother Wins, We lose... From /. Real-ID Passes U.S. Senate 100-0</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> groups at ChangingLINKS.com (ChangingLINKS.com)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00224" href="msg00224.html">[ale] [OT] Big Brother Wins, We lose... From /. Real-ID Passes U.S. Senate 100-0</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> esoteric at 3times25.net (Geoffrey)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00232" href="msg00232.html">[ale] [OT] Big Brother Wins, We lose... From /. Real-ID Passes U.S. Senate 100-0</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> groups at ChangingLINKS.com (ChangingLINKS.com)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00236.html">[ale] OT: U.S. National Identity Cards All But Law</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00238.html">[ale] OT: U.S. National Identity Cards All But Law</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00232.html">[ale] [OT] Big Brother Wins, We lose... From /. Real-ID Passes U.S. Senate 100-0</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00240.html">[ale] [OT] Big Brother Wins, We lose... From /. Real-ID Passes U.S. Senate 100-0</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00237"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00237"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>