[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[no subject]



I vote against the [PT] .
My thinking is that if we can't get people to USE [OT] consistently, there is 
no way they will remember to use [PT]. I thought that telling people to use 
[OT] would be a solution, BUT then there will be tons of flamewars on what is 
"[OT] or not." A better solution is to charge $1 for failing to use [OT] - 
but again, enforcement of that rule would cause enforcement flamewars. :)

> Seriously, 
> there's never been any productive discussions on politics on this list.
> Nothing is gained, people just blow the bandwidth.

There IS something gained in these flamewars. 
   If there wasn't, they wouldn't happen.
    I can think of numerous benefits off of the top of my head.

Likewise, the "wasting/blowing bandwidth" objection gets repeated everytime a 
discussion is [OT]. The objection is not only invalid, but just as 
"non-productive" as the original thread. Still, apparently there IS a benefit 
for restating the false argument of "saving bandwidth."

Flamewars, Saving bandwidth and other seemingly pointless behaviors will 
always be a part of this list. The "wise" don't participate, post worthless 
objections, or even post objections TO those objections.
-- 
Wishing you Happiness, Joy, and Laughter,
Drew Brown
<a  rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ChangingLINKS.com";>http://www.ChangingLINKS.com</a>


/objection to an objection


</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00237" href="msg00237.html">[ale] [OT] Big Brother Wins,	We lose... From /. Real-ID Passes U.S. Senate 100-0</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> brian.stanaland at gmail.com (Brian Stanaland)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00171" href="msg00171.html">[ale] Big Brother Wins,	We lose...  From /.  Real-ID Passes U.S. Senate 100-0</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> rsj at radio.org (Randal Jarrett)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00221" href="msg00221.html">[ale] [OT] Big Brother Wins,	We lose... From /. Real-ID Passes	U.S. Senate	100-0</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> groups at ChangingLINKS.com (ChangingLINKS.com)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00224" href="msg00224.html">[ale] [OT] Big Brother Wins, We lose... From /. Real-ID Passes	U.S. Senate 100-0</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> esoteric at 3times25.net (Geoffrey)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00231.html">[ale] Mozilla in Kiosk mode</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00233.html">[ale] OT: U.S. National Identity Cards All But Law</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00225.html">[ale] [OT] Big Brother Wins,	We lose... From /. Real-ID Passes U.S. Senate 100-0</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00237.html">[ale] [OT] Big Brother Wins,	We lose... From /. Real-ID Passes U.S. Senate 100-0</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00232"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00232"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>

<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>