[no subject]

Jim Popovitch wrote:
> I heavily looked into doing the all VoIP at Home thing a few months ago.
> In short the latency and packetloss issues of using either 256K DSL
> (BellSouth) or 5Mb/384k Cable (Comcast) made it impossible to conduct a
> business call without seriously causing problems for people on the other
> end of the call or conference bridge.  Vonage is probably ok for limited
> use to call and order a pizza or such.  VoIP in general for broadband
> home users just isn't there (IMHO) for "realtime" conversations where
> you don't have a 5 sec lag and you aren't constantly repeating things.
> 
> A really really bad TDMA cellphone connection is still better than
> broadband VoIP these days.  Tomorrow may change things as codecs are
> constantly improved and networks (hopefully) become more reliable.
> 

So, in short, it wouldn't be good for general contact, is that right?

Are there no codecs that can adequately compress to telephone standard
quality?  I thought that was in the single-digit kb/sec range?  Am I
wrong in that?

How much bandwidth does a single call require?

	- Mike

- --
Michael B. Trausch                               <fd0man at gmail.com>
Website: <a  rel="nofollow" href="http://fd0man.chadeux.net/";>http://fd0man.chadeux.net/</a>     Jabber: mtrausch at jabber.com
Phone: +1-(678)-522-7934              FAX (US Only): 1-866-806-4647
===================================================================
Do you have PGP or GPG?  Key at pgp.mit.edu, Please Encrypt E-Mail!

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - <a  rel="nofollow" href="http://enigmail.mozdev.org";>http://enigmail.mozdev.org</a>

iD8DBQFCTEbfPXInbkqM7nwRAsPBAJ4zXyYUFdiGbZVaKz+cJmY+NFqD5gCfUaON
gIhmKS9vdYJc2vqoiV9d1AA=
=o/Du
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00572" href="msg00572.html">[ale] [OT] VoIP recommendations</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> cfowler at outpostsentinel.com (Christopher Fowler)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00573" href="msg00573.html">[ale] [OT] VoIP recommendations</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> jimpop at yahoo.com (Jim Popovitch)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00577" href="msg00577.html">[ale] [OT] VoIP recommendations</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> esoteric at 3times25.net (Geoffrey)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00565" href="msg00565.html">[ale] [OT] VoIP recommendations</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> fd0man at gmail.com (Michael B. Trausch)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00566" href="msg00566.html">[ale] [OT] VoIP recommendations</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> jimpop at yahoo.com (Jim Popovitch)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00569.html">[ale] [OT] VoIP recommendations</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00571.html">[ale] [OT] VoIP recommendations</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00566.html">[ale] [OT] VoIP recommendations</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00572.html">[ale] [OT] VoIP recommendations</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00570"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00570"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>

<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>