[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-date: Fri Mar 25 21:23:19 2005 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: inaybttvaf ng tznvy.pbz (Hna Zbttvaf) -->
- <!--x-message-id: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-subject: [ale] Any redistributable ISOs of current RedHat? -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Fri Mar 25 21:23:19 2005</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: vanloggins at gmail.com (Van Loggins)</li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] Any redistributable ISOs of current RedHat?</li>
In case you are interested in legally trying out the latest version of
Redhat ES take a look at this
Free 30-day Evaluation Subscription
to Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.redhat.com/software/rhel/eval/">http://www.redhat.com/software/rhel/eval/</a>
I signed up for it and snagged a copy of RedHat Advanced Server 4.0
also a decent free alternative is CentOS 4.0
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.centos.org/">http://www.centos.org/</a>
I used to recommend Whitebox, but it's pretty much a 1 man show and it
sometimes takes him a long time to get updates out, plus he doesn't seem
to be interested in doing a whitebox 4.0 release.
Thanks and have a great day.
Van
>Message: 6
>Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 15:42:49 -0500
>From: "Mills, John M." <Mills.J at ems-t.com>
>Subject: [ale] Any redistributable ISOs of current RedHat?
>To: "Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts (E-mail)" <ale at ale.org>
>Message-ID:
> <8509A0473763CE41A0A3D19A0E2C76F5015B7AEF at mre04.enterprise.com>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>ALErs -
>
>When RedHat first split their Linux distro between commercial RHL (with some
>copyrighted content) and fully redistributable Fedora, some folks began
>culling out a freely-distributable, installable subset of the RHL products.
>Is this still being done? Is there a source of downloadable ISO images for
>installation?
>
>Context: I need current kernel and libraries, but harbor some FUD about
>stability and pain of installing Fedora. Should I just go with Fedora?
>
>TIA for comments.
>
> - John Mills
>
>
>
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00490.html">[ale] Need to connect to a MS Access database from Linux</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00492.html">[ale] Cisco support/replacement vendor information needed</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00486.html">[ale] Any redistributable ISOs of current RedHat?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00494.html">[ale] OT: the Constitution as EULA</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00491"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00491"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>