[no subject]

> free, if you don't mind no support and have one of the approximately 3 PCs
> (or pretty much any Ultrasparc) it runs on. 

Ok, let's stop right there. S10 runs on darn near every x86 server
produced in the past three years by the big three (HPaq, IBM, Dell)
and I have it up and running on a variety of mainstream desktops as
well as one rather obscure laptop. The HCL is located at
<a  rel="nofollow" href="http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/hcl";>http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/hcl</a> if you'd like to see for yourself. It
does not list the aforementioned  &quot;darn near every x86 server produced
in the past three years by the big three&quot; but one can look at that
list and draw their own conclusions. Furthermore, in almost any
context, S10 support is cheaper than RHAS. The facts are the facts.

This should be considered more of a slam against RH than an outright
endorsement of Sun, for those wondering if I have totally gone over
the edge. I'll admit to being at the edge looking down though. Of
course Slackware is still the same, whether you pay for it or leech
it. ;)

--
Jonathan


</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00463" href="msg00463.html">[ale] SMP support for CentOS 4.0 i386</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> esoteric at 3times25.net (Geoffrey)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00465" href="msg00465.html">[ale] SMP support for CentOS 4.0 i386</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> kaboom at oobleck.net (Chris Ricker)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00437" href="msg00437.html">[ale] SMP support for CentOS 4.0 i386</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> Jerry.Yu at Voicecom.com (Yu, Jerry)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00438" href="msg00438.html">[ale] SMP support for CentOS 4.0 i386</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> hbbs at comcast.net (Jeff Hubbs)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00439" href="msg00439.html">[ale] SMP support for CentOS 4.0 i386</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> cfowler at outpostsentinel.com (Christopher Fowler)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00442" href="msg00442.html">[ale] SMP support for CentOS 4.0 i386</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> esoteric at 3times25.net (Geoffrey)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00445" href="msg00445.html">[ale] SMP support for CentOS 4.0 i386</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> jrickman at gmail.com (Jonathan Rickman)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00451" href="msg00451.html">[ale] SMP support for CentOS 4.0 i386</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> esoteric at 3times25.net (Geoffrey)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00457" href="msg00457.html">[ale] SMP support for CentOS 4.0 i386</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> kaboom at oobleck.net (Chris Ricker)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00458.html">[ale] Re: [Resolved] Any Navicat users??</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00460.html">[ale] OT: Help me! I need an MBA internship this summer!</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00457.html">[ale] SMP support for CentOS 4.0 i386</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00463.html">[ale] SMP support for CentOS 4.0 i386</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00459"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00459"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>

<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>