[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-date: Thu Mar 24 15:18:30 2005 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: Xreel.Kh ng Hbvprpbz.pbz (Kh, Xreel) -->
- <!--x-message-id: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-subject: [ale] SMP support for CentOS 4.0 i386 -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Thu Mar 24 15:18:30 2005</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: Jerry.Yu at Voicecom.com (Yu, Jerry)</li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] SMP support for CentOS 4.0 i386</li>
# -----Original Message-----
# From: ale-bounces at ale.org [<a rel="nofollow" href="mailto:ale-bounces">mailto:ale-bounces</a> at ale.org]
# Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 2:31 PM
# To: Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts
# Subject: Re: [ale] SMP support for CentOS 4.0 i386
#
#
# CentOS is compiled from RHEL source. That source is still
# GPL. I can't
# see how RH can enforce something like that on the license. It
# could be
# possible that Redhat has changed the kernel code in such a
# way, to only
# use at most twoCPUs, but if that were the case nothing would
# prevent you
# from changing it back. I know the guys over at
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.openfiler.org">http://www.openfiler.org</a>
use CentOS as there base distribution for the OpenFiler project, you may
want to ask those guys this question, they would probably know.
Denny
Yu, Jerry wrote:
> anybody know how many CPU can CentOS 4.0 support? Its redhat
> counterpart "RHEL 4.0 ES" supports only 2. I'd assume it is
> restriction of RHEL license instead of 'feature lock' in the kernel,
> right?
>
> This email and any attached files herein contain information that is
> intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is
> addressed and may contain information that is legally privileged,
> confidential or otherwise exempt from disclosure under applicable
> laws. If the reader of this message is not the recipient, any
> disclosure, dissemination, distribution, copying or other use or
> retention of this communication or its substance is prohibited.
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>Ale mailing list
>Ale at ale.org
><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale">http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>
>
--
=========================================================
Denny Chambers
Unix IS user friendly - it's just picky about it's friends.
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00438" href="msg00438.html">[ale] SMP support for CentOS 4.0 i386</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> hbbs at comcast.net (Jeff Hubbs)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00436.html">[ale] SMP support for CentOS 4.0 i386</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00438.html">[ale] SMP support for CentOS 4.0 i386</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00440.html">[ale] SMP support for CentOS 4.0 i386</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00438.html">[ale] SMP support for CentOS 4.0 i386</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00437"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00437"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>