[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[no subject]



# -----Original Message-----
# From: ale-bounces at ale.org [<a  rel="nofollow" href="mailto:ale-bounces";>mailto:ale-bounces</a> at ale.org]
# Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 2:31 PM
# To: Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts
# Subject: Re: [ale] SMP support for CentOS 4.0 i386
# 
# 
# CentOS is compiled from RHEL source. That source is still 
# GPL. I can't 
# see how RH can enforce something like that on the license. It 
# could be 
# possible that Redhat has changed the kernel code in such a 
# way, to only 
# use at most twoCPUs, but if that were the case nothing would 
# prevent you 
# from changing it back. I know the guys over at 
<a  rel="nofollow" href="http://www.openfiler.org";>http://www.openfiler.org</a> 
use CentOS as there base distribution for the OpenFiler project, you may 
want to ask those guys this question, they would probably know.

Denny

Yu, Jerry wrote:

&gt; anybody know how many CPU can CentOS 4.0 support?    Its redhat 
&gt; counterpart &quot;RHEL 4.0 ES&quot; supports only 2. I'd assume it is 
&gt; restriction of RHEL license  instead of 'feature lock' in the kernel, 
&gt; right?
&gt;
&gt; This email and any attached files herein contain information that is 
&gt; intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is 
&gt; addressed and may contain information that is legally privileged, 
&gt; confidential or otherwise exempt from disclosure under applicable 
&gt; laws. If the reader of this message is not the recipient, any 
&gt; disclosure, dissemination, distribution, copying or other use or 
&gt; retention of this communication or its substance is prohibited.
&gt;
&gt;------------------------------------------------------------------------
&gt;
&gt;_______________________________________________
&gt;Ale mailing list
&gt;Ale at ale.org
&gt;<a  rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale";>http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>
&gt;

-- 
=========================================================
Denny Chambers

Unix IS user friendly - it's just picky about it's friends.


</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00438" href="msg00438.html">[ale] SMP support for CentOS 4.0 i386</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> hbbs at comcast.net (Jeff Hubbs)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00436.html">[ale] SMP support for CentOS 4.0 i386</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00438.html">[ale] SMP support for CentOS 4.0 i386</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00440.html">[ale] SMP support for CentOS 4.0 i386</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00438.html">[ale] SMP support for CentOS 4.0 i386</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00437"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00437"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>

<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>