[no subject]

FAT32 is still the most, or rather least common denomitor, I'm afraid.

Mike


aaron wrote:
> FAT32 seems to be the LCD for free, fully cross platform read and write.
> 
> I have found 2 commercial HFS+ options for windblows systems, and will be 
> using them to make our Mac OSeX external 1394 (a / b) media drives functional 
> on the one windblows box we are still stick with for a few audio production 
> aps.
> 
> Unfortunately, my research showed that HFS+ support under linux is sketchy at 
> best, with nothing showing up for newer kernels. UFS could be considered, but 
> under MAC OSeX it introduces some discrepancies with "expectations" of the 
> standard user environment. 
> 
> Would be interested to know if you find any other solutions
> 
> peace
> (because the only christian faith is a faith that prizes peace above all else)
> aaron
> 
> 
> 
> On Sunday 20 March 2005 01:52, John Wells wrote:
> 
>>Guys,
>>
>>I'm going to reformat my ext3 drive to something compatible with a 3 of the 
> 
> OS's
> 
>>in the msg subject for use as a backup drive in a usb enclosure.  (I know 
> 
> ext3
> 
>>support is available for OS X and XP, but it's been hit or miss so far).
>>
>>FAT32 comes immediately to mind as a likely candidate, but I wondered if 
> 
> anyone
> 
>>on the list might have a better recommendation.
>>
>>Any info you can provide is greatly appreciated!
>>
>>Thanks,
>>John
>>_______________________________________________
>>Ale mailing list
>>Ale at ale.org
&gt;&gt;<a  rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale";>http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;
&gt; 
&gt; 
&gt; _______________________________________________
&gt; Ale mailing list
&gt; Ale at ale.org
&gt; <a  rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale";>http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>

-- 

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Mike Murphy
781 Inman Mews Drive Atlanta GA 30307
Landline: 404-653-1070
Mobile: 404-545-6234
Email: mike at tyderia.net
AIM: mmichael453
ICBM: 33:45:14.0584N  84:21:43.038W
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+


</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00353" href="msg00353.html">[ale] Best FS for archiving Mac OS X, Linux, and Windows XP?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> astewart at layton-graphics.com (Alan Stewart)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00337" href="msg00337.html">[ale] Best FS for archiving Mac OS X, Linux, and Windows XP?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> jb at sourceillustrated.com (John Wells)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00339" href="msg00339.html">[ale] Best FS for archiving Mac OS X, Linux, and Windows XP?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> aaron at pd.org (aaron)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00339.html">[ale] Best FS for archiving Mac OS X, Linux, and Windows XP?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00341.html">[ale] Determining USB transfer speed</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00339.html">[ale] Best FS for archiving Mac OS X, Linux, and Windows XP?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00353.html">[ale] Best FS for archiving Mac OS X, Linux, and Windows XP?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00340"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00340"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>

<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>