[no subject]

As it happens, I'm having a related issue.  Boot a junker to Gentoo, 2.6
kernel, and the drive is "blacklisted" for DMA; boot same machine to
Knoppix cd w/2.4, and DMA enables on hda - and it makes a difference in
hdparm -t (4.?MB/s vs. 7.?MB/s).  The story is that if I were to back
down to 2.4 or whatever to get around the blacklisting, I'm courting
danger to the filesystem unless I can update the drive's firmware.

Jeff

On Sat, 2005-01-29 at 19:15 -0500, David Corbin wrote:
> I moved a drive into an existing system as the primary master.  Now, the BIOS 
> and Linux say both drives do not have DMA enabled.
> 
> Not sure why it would be different than before, but either way, how do I 
> things "back in order"?
> 
> David
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
&gt; <a  rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale";>http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>


</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00337.html">[ale] Best FS for archiving Mac OS X, Linux, and Windows XP?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00339.html">[ale] Best FS for archiving Mac OS X, Linux, and Windows XP?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00354.html">[ale] Best FS for archiving Mac OS X, Linux, and Windows XP?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00343.html">[ale] Webcam recommendation</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00338"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00338"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>

<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>