[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain -->
- <!--x-date: Fri Jun 3 18:31:33 2005 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: genafnz ng irelfrpheryvahk.pbz (Pbo Fbkra) -->
- <!--x-message-id: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: 1117746280.21522.21.camel@localhost -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: 1117813553.6941.30.camel@localhost --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-subject: [ale] iptables limits? -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Fri Jun 3 18:31:33 2005</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: transam at verysecurelinux.com (Bob Toxen)</li>
- <li><em>in-reply-to</em>: <1117813553.6941.30.camel@localhost></li>
- <li><em>references</em>: <1117746280.21522.21.camel@localhost> <<a href="msg00105.html">[email protected]</a>> <<a href="msg00107.html">[email protected]</a>> <<a href="msg00118.html">[email protected]</a>> <<a href="msg00141.html">[email protected]</a>> <1117813553.6941.30.camel@localhost></li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] iptables limits?</li>
> OK, the double speak needs some restraint. ;-)
> Regarding large quantities of iptables rules, what other ways would you
> go about:
> -blocking 3,000+ IPs from ongoing port scan attacks
> -blocking 2,500+ IPs from http/https scripting attacks
> -blocking 1,200+ IPs from sending viruses and/or smtp port-knocking
> I suppose I could be cruel and block the common subnets, but then
> instead of restricting 7,000 IPs I could be restricting 7M.
I agree that the 7,000 rules to block them is reasonable. I do something
similar.
> If 50,000 iptable rules don't cause any problems then why not use them?
Indeed.
> -Jim P.
Bob
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00104" href="msg00104.html">[ale] iptables limits?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> jimpop at yahoo.com (Jim Popovitch)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00105" href="msg00105.html">[ale] iptables limits?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> cfowler at outpostsentinel.com (Christopher Fowler)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00107" href="msg00107.html">[ale] iptables limits?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> jrickman at gmail.com (Jonathan Rickman)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00118" href="msg00118.html">[ale] iptables limits?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> esoteric at 3times25.net (Geoffrey)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00141" href="msg00141.html">[ale] iptables limits?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> jrickman at gmail.com (Jonathan Rickman)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00142" href="msg00142.html">[ale] iptables limits?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> jimpop at yahoo.com (Jim Popovitch)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00146.html">[ale] Pan [newsreader] -> help in implementing a new news server</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00148.html">[ale] Debian 3.0 as a server platform?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00143.html">[ale] iptables limits?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00108.html">[ale] iptables limits?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00147"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00147"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>