[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain -->
- <!--x-date: Fri Jun 3 07:43:15 2005 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: rfbgrevp ng 3gvzrf25.arg (Urbsserl) -->
- <!--x-message-id: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-subject: [ale] Debian 3.0 as a server platform? -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Fri Jun 3 07:43:15 2005</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: esoteric at 3times25.net (Geoffrey)</li>
- <li><em>in-reply-to</em>: <<a href="msg00128.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>references</em>: <<a href="msg00045.html">[email protected]</a>> <[email protected]> <<a href="msg00127.html">[email protected]</a>> <<a href="msg00128.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] Debian 3.0 as a server platform?</li>
I don't know about that.
> 1. Platforms? Small footprint? Old Hardware? No change?
> None of that interests me . . . or anyone with a few dollars.
> I wonder what the cost analysis would show: Is it better to use Debian on old
> or obscure hardware, or simply change the hardware? (I don't know)
My point, and I've not done very well getting it across. Caught up in
the heat of the moment I guess. There is a place for Debian. There are
users who are suited to Debian. There is a huge number of architectures
supported. Debian has a different philosophy then other distros. It's
not a commercially built product. All these things make Debian what it
is. It's just not for me. I like using the latest greatest stuff. And
I don't have problems doing so.
I do think that Debian could be more productive by dropping some of the
more obscure architectures, but that's their decision, not mine.
> 2. The Dr. Jekyl, (stable) Mr. Hyde (unstable/testing) argument is weak.
> Seems like it would be better to roll your own distro and skip the psychotic
> mentality altogether. That way YOU determine the release date and YOU can
> test to see what is stable and what isn't and YOU can create a single "stable
> and secure" operating system. Starting with "Linux."
I don't know that it is psychotic. Virtually all distros have their
stable releases (RH Enterprise, Mandrake) and their bleeding edge
versions (Fedora, Mandrake Cooker). This is a good thing.
> 3. The Debian Defenders aren't turning the negatives into positives very well.
> Debian doesn't need "debunking" - it has it's fan club's defenses.
I agree, it does not need debunking.
> 4. I'm running a variant of a variant of a variant of a variant of Debian
> (with inspiration from other variants) and at this point, I kinda wish I had
> stuck with Gentoo (even though other users were intimidated by it).
I just don't have time for Gentoo. I'd love to do an install, but I
just don't have the time (right now). There definitely is a learning
curve with Gentoo.
> 5. One thing we can all agree on is that Debian has improved the Linux
> community tremendously . . .
I agree wholeheartedly.
--
Until later, Geoffrey
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00132" href="msg00132.html">[ale] Debian 3.0 as a server platform?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> pizza at shaftnet.org (Stuffed Crust)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00144" href="msg00144.html">[ale] Debian 3.0 as a server platform?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> groups at ChangingLINKS.com (ChangingLINKS.com)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00045" href="msg00045.html">[ale] Debian 3.0 as a server platform?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> jb at sourceillustrated.com (John Wells)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00124" href="msg00124.html">[ale] Debian 3.0 as a server platform?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> fishy at fishynet.net (Thomas Holmquist)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00127" href="msg00127.html">[ale] Debian 3.0 as a server platform?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> esoteric at 3times25.net (Geoffrey)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00128" href="msg00128.html">[ale] Debian 3.0 as a server platform?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> groups at ChangingLINKS.com (ChangingLINKS.com)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00130.html">[ale] Debian 3.0 as a server platform?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00132.html">[ale] Debian 3.0 as a server platform?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00128.html">[ale] Debian 3.0 as a server platform?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00132.html">[ale] Debian 3.0 as a server platform?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00131"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00131"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>