[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain -->
- <!--x-date: Thu Jun 2 11:54:12 2005 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: oneel ng olgrznfba.bet (Pneel Vnjxvaf) -->
- <!--x-message-id: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-subject: [ale] Debian 3.0 as a server platform? -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Thu Jun 2 11:54:12 2005</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: barry at bytemason.org (Barry Hawkins)</li>
- <li><em>in-reply-to</em>: <<a href="msg00070.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>references</em>: <<a href="msg00045.html">[email protected]</a>> <[email protected]> <<a href="msg00063.html">[email protected]</a>> <<a href="msg00070.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] Debian 3.0 as a server platform?</li>
You would not be the first person I have communicated with who is unaware
of shortcuts that are taken in the name of expediency for that distro. It
is more a reflection of the different forces driving the two than anything
inherently "wrong" with the one or the other. So, as long as there is not
an attempt on the part of either distro as to what their aims and practices
are, there is no point of contention.
> For comparison, Debian 3.0 shipped July 2002. Debian 3.1 ships Monday.
> Something's very slow about the Debian stabilization process, but it's
> not the "open software only" guidelines.... My guess is it's that everyone
> involved spends too much time in flame wars on debian-devel ;-).
[...]
The release schedules for Debian have been embarrassingly slow, and it has
been a real "black eye" for perception of Debian. Geeks in the know simply
use testing and unstable and roll on, but new folks who look at it and see
a last stable release of 3 years ago are immediately turned off - and rightly
so. The hope is that we are making some big changes in that respect.
While the flame wars on debian-devel are as alive as they are on any other
distro's developer list, I am quite certain that the adherence to Debian
policy and the fact that it is indeed all-volunteer are major factors in
how fast things progress. I also believe that Debian's not being encumbered
by corporate directives can account for the lax pace as well. This has its
own set of pros and cons, but it is the set that I agree with enough to give
of my own time and effort.
Fedora is not the same as Debian; obviously not in content, but also not in
its policies, aims, and driving motivators. Both have their place within
the Linux ecosystem. I only tend to see assertions that Fedora is like
Debian; I rarely see an assertion made in the other direction. Perhaps that
entrepeneurial and spririted movement ideal, not being subsidized and steered
by a corporation, appeals to the sense of freedom with those persons who make
this assertion. There's a "cool" element to it. But that kind of "cool" has
its price; expediency, resource wealth, and slick packaging are some that I
often miss. But, all in all, I still choose the freedom route.
Regards,
--
Barry Hawkins
All Things Computed
site: www.alltc.com
weblog: www.yepthatsme.com
Registered Linux User #368650
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00130" href="msg00130.html">[ale] Debian 3.0 as a server platform?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> kaboom at oobleck.net (Chris Ricker)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00045" href="msg00045.html">[ale] Debian 3.0 as a server platform?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> jb at sourceillustrated.com (John Wells)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00049" href="msg00049.html">[ale] Debian 3.0 as a server platform?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> fishy at fishynet.net (Thomas Holmquist)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00063" href="msg00063.html">[ale] Debian 3.0 as a server platform?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> barry at bytemason.org (Barry Hawkins)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00070" href="msg00070.html">[ale] Debian 3.0 as a server platform?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> kaboom at oobleck.net (Chris Ricker)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00085.html">[ale] Debian 3.0 as a server platform?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00087.html">[ale] Debian 3.0 as a server platform?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00070.html">[ale] Debian 3.0 as a server platform?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00130.html">[ale] Debian 3.0 as a server platform?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00086"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00086"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>