[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain -->
- <!--x-date: Wed Jun 1 18:48:42 2005 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: Dboreg.Z.Vneevf ng eqyt.arg (Dboreg Z. Vneevf) -->
- <!--x-message-id: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-subject: [ale] Debian 3.0 as a server platform? -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Wed Jun 1 18:48:42 2005</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: Robert.L.Harris at rdlg.net (Robert L. Harris)</li>
- <li><em>in-reply-to</em>: <<a href="msg00045.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>references</em>: <<a href="msg00045.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] Debian 3.0 as a server platform?</li>
How much control do you have over the configuration? It's possible to
import only cerntain packages from advanced distrobutions
(debian-testing). My company runs about 750 Production servers on
Debian 3.0. It's been rock solid for us, I wouldn't change it.
Thus spake John Wells (jb at sourceillustrated.com):
> Guys,
>
> As I mentioned, I'm considering using a VPS to host a number of accounts I
> have. The operating system options are RH9, Fedora Core 1, Fedora Core 2,
> Debian 3.0, or CentOS.
>
> I'm very familiar with the Red Hat way of doing things, but have switched
> in the last 6 months to Debian-based (Ubuntu, UserLinux) systems on the
> desktop and have become very enamored with apt (yes, RH has apt4rpm, but
> package selection is often limited).
>
> So, long story short, I'm considering going with Debian 3.0 as my server
> platform. However, I know Debian is notorious for slow adoption of
> technology and is typically running many versions behind RH for most
> software.
>
> Do any of you have thoughts along these lines? Would you recommend
> Debian? Any reason you would recommend NOT using Debian?
>
> Thanks, as always!
>
> John
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale">http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>
:wq!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert L. Harris | GPG Key ID: E344DA3B
@ x-hkp://pgp.mit.edu
DISCLAIMER:
These are MY OPINIONS With Dreams To Be A King,
ALONE. I speak for First One Should Be A Man
no-one else. - Manowar
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00045" href="msg00045.html">[ale] Debian 3.0 as a server platform?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> jb at sourceillustrated.com (John Wells)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00047.html">[ale] OT: Testing SNPP</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00049.html">[ale] Debian 3.0 as a server platform?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00064.html">[ale] Debian 3.0 as a server platform?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00049.html">[ale] Debian 3.0 as a server platform?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00048"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00048"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>