[no subject]

> So you have one real IP on the firewall box and virtual IP's that are
> directly routed to the real box's private IP.
> 
> "iptables -t NAT -I PREROUTING -d <public IP> -j DNAT --to-destination
> <private IP>"
> 
> There will be no filtering at all on this.
> 
> Then add a back route:
> "iptables -t nat -I POSTROUTING -s <private IP> -j SNAT --to-source
> <public IP>"
> 
> It would be good to modify those rules by making a series of tables that
> filters out the crap before just routing all the bandwidth to the work
> machines.

Thats is an interesting idea.  Does this have any limitations?



</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00003" href="msg00003.html">[ale] Firewall design</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> transam at verysecurelinux.com (Bob Toxen)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00011" href="msg00011.html">[ale] Firewall design</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> cfowler at outpostsentinel.com (Christopher Fowler)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00014" href="msg00014.html">[ale] Firewall design</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> jkinney at localnetsolutions.com (James P. Kinney III)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00015.html">[ale] Can anyone help me get the Rox Filer to work	with	E	inSUSE9.1</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00017.html">[ale] NO ALE CENTRAL MEETING for JUNE.</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00014.html">[ale] Firewall design</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00009.html">[ale] Firewall design</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00016"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00016"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>

<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>