[no subject]

So far, the connection is transpararently stable <sound of cr at 5h> over 3 
weeks.  Yes, they'll be converting all their customers to PPPoE due to a 
"significant" cost increase by Bell$outh they wished to not pass on to 
their customers.  So they claim.

-- Paul

On Wed, 1 Jun 2005, Mark Wright wrote:

> I had to switch last night.  The letter they sent said I would still  
> have my IP address.  How can that be?  I wrote SF a note to ask if  
> they were reducing my bill too.
> 
> I will probably go with bell if I can't have a static IP any more.   
> Why pay SF $20 more than bell for nothing?
> 
> Mark
> 
> On Jun 1, 2005, at 12:42 AM, Jerald Sheets wrote:
> 
> > Same here...
> >
> > --J
> >
> > --- Raylynn Knight <audilover at speedfactory.net> wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, 2005-05-31 at 08:47 -0400, Christopher
> >> Fowler wrote:
> >>
> >>> I came into my remote office today to discover
> >>>
> >> that Speedfactory had
> >>
> >>> switched me over to PPPOE.  Apparently they sent
> >>>
> >> one of my partners an
> >>
> >>> email and I've not received it.  This causes pain
> >>>
> >> because the only
> >>
> >>> reason why I've not switched to PPPOE and their
> >>>
> >> faster speed before was
> >>
> >>> because I could not afford the downtime.
> >>>
> >>> They told me that everyone was forced to go to
> >>>
> >> PPPOE.  Is this true?
> >>
> >>> What about Speakeasy.
> >>>
> >>> I will add this. <flamebait>The only reason I've
> >>>
> >> not switched to
> >>
> >>> BS</flamebait> is because of the level of support
> >>>
> >> I get from these
> >>
> >>> guys.  They helped me setup PPPOE on Linux twice.
> >>>
> >> BS would say "Linux
> >>
> >>> is not supported".  They've returned my calls and
> >>>
> >> have called me back
> >>
> >>> when things began working again.  Now since I'm
> >>>
> >> forced to go  PPPOE my
> >>
> >>> only thing keeping me with SF is the support.
> >>>
> >> Does SE force PPPOE?
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Chris
> >>>
> >>>
> >> I'm with speedfactory and I don't have PPPOE.
> >> Perhaps its because I pay
> >> for extra static IP addresses.
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Ale mailing list
> >> Ale at ale.org
&gt; &gt;&gt; <a  rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale";>http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>
&gt; &gt;&gt;
&gt; &gt;&gt;
&gt; &gt; _______________________________________________
&gt; &gt; Ale mailing list
&gt; &gt; Ale at ale.org
&gt; &gt; <a  rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale";>http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>
&gt; &gt;
&gt; 
&gt; _______________________________________________
&gt; Ale mailing list
&gt; Ale at ale.org
&gt; <a  rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale";>http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>
&gt; 


</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00004" href="msg00004.html">[ale] Screwed by PPP0E</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> mpwright at speedfactory.net (Mark Wright)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00007.html">[ale] Screwed by PPP0E</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00009.html">[ale] Firewall design</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00007.html">[ale] Screwed by PPP0E</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00002.html">[ale] OT: Good Support Company for 3Com IP Phone System?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00008"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00008"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>

<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>