[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain -->
- <!--x-date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 13:48:37 -0400 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: psbjyre ng bhgcbfgfragvary.pbz (Quevfgbcure Tbjyre) -->
- <!--x-message-id: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: 002501c58640$75cd39a0$[email protected] --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-subject: [ale] Best FS to use when doing unclean shutdowns? -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 13:48:37 -0400</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: cfowler at outpostsentinel.com (Christopher Fowler)</li>
- <li><em>in-reply-to</em>: <002501c58640$75cd39a0$[email protected]></li>
- <li><em>references</em>: <002501c58640$75cd39a0$[email protected]></li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] Best FS to use when doing unclean shutdowns?</li>
Why does the system have to be hard cycled?
>
> Thanks.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ale-bounces at ale.org [<a rel="nofollow" href="mailto:ale-bounces";>mailto:ale-bounces</a> at ale.org] On Behalf Of
> Christopher Fowler
> Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 1:38 PM
> To: Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts
> Subject: Re: [ale] Best FS to use when doing unclean shutdowns?
>
> On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 13:30 -0400, Geoffrey wrote:
> > Christopher Fowler wrote:
> > > Ext3
> >
> > I stand by my statement. :) Journal filesystems will certainly have a
>
> > better chance of recovering lost data, but none of them are perfect.
> At
> > least not as good as a proper shutdown.
> >
> >
>
> I agree. He asked the best FS. In these cases I uses a ext2 in RO mode
> and symlink everything that has to be R/W in a tmpfs. A pile of work
> but makes a system that does not barf.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale";>http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>
>
>
> Visit us at the 28th Annual BAI Retail Delivery Conference & Expo, November 15-18, 2005 - Orlando FL!
>
>
> This email and any files transmitted with it are solely intended for the use of the
> addressee(s) and may contain information that is confidential and privileged. If
> you receive this email in error, please advise us by return email immediately.
> Please also disregard the contents of the email, delete it and destroy any copies
> immediately.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale";>http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00163" href="msg00163.html">[ale] Best FS to use when doing unclean shutdowns?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> CMorlan at filink.com (Claudia Morlan)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00157" href="msg00157.html">[ale] Best FS to use when doing unclean shutdowns?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> CMorlan at filink.com (Claudia Morlan)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00158.html">[ale] Best FS to use when doing unclean shutdowns?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00160.html">[ale] Best FS to use when doing unclean shutdowns?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00157.html">[ale] Best FS to use when doing unclean shutdowns?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00163.html">[ale] Best FS to use when doing unclean shutdowns?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00159"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00159"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>