[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain -->
- <!--x-date: Tue Jul 5 14:06:24 2005 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: zquvefpu ng tznvy.pbz ([vpunry Vvefpu) -->
- <!--x-message-id: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-subject: [ale] Two-part Bit Torrent Client? -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Tue Jul 5 14:06:24 2005</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: mdhirsch at gmail.com (Michael Hirsch)</li>
- <li><em>in-reply-to</em>: <<a href="msg00040.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>references</em>: <<a href="msg00038.html">[email protected]</a>> <<a href="msg00039.html">[email protected]</a>> <<a href="msg00040.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] Two-part Bit Torrent Client?</li>
Is your issue that you have multiple machines running bittorrent and
it is hard to open up the firewall for all of them, or is it just that
you have one client and would rather not open the ports for it?
If the latter, I don't see a big difference between a proxy, and
opening up the ports on the firewall. Either way you are putting a
hole in the firewall. I suppose there could be a political or
administrative difference: If you have access to an outside machine
but not to the firewall you could still get bittorrent to work.
If the problem is that you have multiple clients and want them all to
be able to participate, I'm really not sure if the protocol provides
enough info to the proxy to determine which client to connect to. The
proxy would need to know which client the incoming request is for, and
I don't know if the protocol provides enough information to map to a
particular client.
Michael
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00064" href="msg00064.html">[ale] Two-part Bit Torrent Client?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> james.sumners at gmail.com (James Sumners)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00069" href="msg00069.html">[ale] Two-part Bit Torrent Client?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> dcorbin at machturtle.com (David Corbin)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00038" href="msg00038.html">[ale] Two-part Bit Torrent Client?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> dcorbin at machturtle.com (David Corbin)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00039" href="msg00039.html">[ale] Two-part Bit Torrent Client?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> kafka at antichri.st (George Carless)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00040" href="msg00040.html">[ale] Two-part Bit Torrent Client?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> dcorbin at machturtle.com (David Corbin)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00059.html">[ale] awstats & PHPbb compromises over weekend</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00061.html">[ale] Previous talks on ale.org</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00040.html">[ale] Two-part Bit Torrent Client?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00064.html">[ale] Two-part Bit Torrent Client?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00060"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00060"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>