[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain -->
- <!--x-date: Thu Feb 24 20:54:42 2005 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: psbjyre ng bhgcbfgfragvary.pbz (Quevfgbcure Tbjyre) -->
- <!--x-message-id: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-subject: [ale] SSL-based VPNs (OpenVPN) vs IPSec -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Thu Feb 24 20:54:42 2005</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: cfowler at outpostsentinel.com (Christopher Fowler)</li>
- <li><em>in-reply-to</em>: <[email protected]></li>
- <li><em>references</em>: <<a href="msg00859.html">[email protected]</a>> <[email protected]></li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] SSL-based VPNs (OpenVPN) vs IPSec</li>
Maybe I'm wrong about IPSec but based on what I've read it can't be
natted. It has to be on a public interface.
On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 18:54, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-02-22 at 15:06 -0500, M Raju wrote:
> > I have been thinking of playing with OpenVPN and convert my existing
> > setup at home which comprises of mainly an IPSec VPN for WiFi/External
> > access - OpenBSD Firewall/Access Point running (ISAkmpd), Racoon on OS
> > X and OpenSWAN for Linux.
>
> > Anyone prefer SSL over IPSec? Found an interesting paper on OpenVPN Security ->
>
> > <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.sans.org/rr/papers/20/1459.pdf">http://www.sans.org/rr/papers/20/1459.pdf</a>
>
> Personally, I would avoid an ssl based VPN like the plague. There is
> no "perfect forward secrecy" or rekeying and the session keys can be
> determined from the PKI authentication keys (in other words, if you
> compromise the key from either end, you can decrypt the traffic, which
> is not the case with IPSec w/ PFS and Diffie-Hellman).
>
>
> > _Raju
>
> Mike
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00930" href="msg00930.html">[ale] SSL-based VPNs (OpenVPN) vs IPSec</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> mhw at wittsend.com (Michael H. Warfield)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00859" href="msg00859.html">[ale] SSL-based VPNs (OpenVPN) vs IPSec</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> protocoljunkie at gmail.com (M Raju)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00927" href="msg00927.html">[ale] SSL-based VPNs (OpenVPN) vs IPSec</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> mhw at wittsend.com (Michael H. Warfield)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00927.html">[ale] SSL-based VPNs (OpenVPN) vs IPSec</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00929.html">[ale] [OT] Upcoming Computers in Cars meet</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00927.html">[ale] SSL-based VPNs (OpenVPN) vs IPSec</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00930.html">[ale] SSL-based VPNs (OpenVPN) vs IPSec</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00928"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00928"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>