[no subject]

That's exactly why I am so upset about apple's confusing product
names. When I say XServe I am referring to the actual SERVER, not the
XServe RAID. We have dropped the XServe RAID from consideration for
exactly the reasons you mentioned. It appears that the XServe RAID is
the only storage solution that the XServe (SERVER) will work with.
That is what I am looking for confirmation on.

--
Jonathan


</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00871" href="msg00871.html">[ale] OT:Apple XServe and non-Apple Storage Arrays</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> jrickman at gmail.com (Jonathan Rickman)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00882" href="msg00882.html">[ale] OT:Apple XServe and non-Apple Storage Arrays</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> greg.freemyer at gmail.com (Greg Freemyer)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00882.html">[ale] OT:Apple XServe and non-Apple Storage Arrays</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00884.html">[ale] OT: Web Dev Question</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00882.html">[ale] OT:Apple XServe and non-Apple Storage Arrays</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00876.html">[ale] OT: Web Dev Question</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00883"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00883"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>

<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>