[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain -->
- <!--x-date: Thu Feb 10 15:19:22 2005 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: rfbgrevp ng 3gvzrf25.arg (Urbsserl) -->
- <!--x-message-id: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: 1108047086.9098.5.camel@blue -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: E25EA9EA-7B8B-11D9-988C-[email protected] --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-subject: [ale] Webcrawlers can harvest ALE Archive E-mail Addresses -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Thu Feb 10 15:19:22 2005</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: esoteric at 3times25.net (Geoffrey)</li>
- <li><em>in-reply-to</em>: <<a href="msg00354.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>references</em>: <<a href="msg00332.html">[email protected]</a>> <1108047086.9098.5.camel@blue> <<a href="msg00353.html">[email protected]</a>> <<a href="msg00354.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] Webcrawlers can harvest ALE Archive E-mail Addresses</li>
How so? There's nothing to back it up. Further, there are scripts out
there that are specifically designed to harvest email addresses with
code that addresses the obfuscation.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Matthew Brown
> CorData, Inc. -- Linux solutions for business
> o: 770-795-0089
>
> On Feb 10, 2005, at 12:43 PM, Michael Hirsch wrote:
>
>> understanding is that email addresses are so easy to harvest right
>> now, that few harvesters bother trying to unobfuscate the email
>> addresses. I suspect that even something as stupid as replacing all
>> '@' symbols with ' AT ' in the archives would significantly reduce my
>> spam. Doing funky stuff with hex codes might work even better.
>> Spammers know that using strange spellings and characters can fool
>> many filters. Similarly, I bet the same tricks would fool many
>> spammers.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale">http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>
--
Until later, Geoffrey
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00332" href="msg00332.html">[ale] Webcrawlers can harvest ALE Archive E-mail Addresses</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> greg at turnstep.com (Greg Sabino Mullane)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00341" href="msg00341.html">[ale] Webcrawlers can harvest ALE Archive E-mail Addresses</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> jimpop at yahoo.com (Jim Popovitch)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00353" href="msg00353.html">[ale] Webcrawlers can harvest ALE Archive E-mail Addresses</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> mdhirsch at gmail.com (Michael Hirsch)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00354" href="msg00354.html">[ale] Webcrawlers can harvest ALE Archive E-mail Addresses</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> matthew.brown at cordata.com (Matthew Brown)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00366.html">[ale] Webcrawlers can harvest ALE Archive E-mail Addresses</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00368.html">[ale] Webcrawlers can harvest ALE Archive E-mail Addresses</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00354.html">[ale] Webcrawlers can harvest ALE Archive E-mail Addresses</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00356.html">[ale] Webcrawlers can harvest ALE Archive E-mail Addresses</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00367"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00367"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>