[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-date: Sat Feb 5 21:46:28 2005 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: Xnzrf.Fnlybe ng rnfgpbootebhc.pbz (Xnzrf Fnlybe) -->
- <!--x-message-id: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-subject: [ale] Nvidia vs ATI on low cost laptops -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Sat Feb 5 21:46:28 2005</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: James.Taylor at eastcobbgroup.com (James Taylor)</li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] Nvidia vs ATI on low cost laptops</li>
7054 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1410.800 FPS
7799 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1559.800 FPS
7799 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1559.800 FPS
7796 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1559.200 FPS
-jt
James Taylor
The East Cobb Group, Inc.
james.taylor at eastcobbgroup.com
678-697-9420
>>>Dow.Hurst at mindspring.com 02/05/05 8:06 pm >>>
Geoffrey,
Howdy! Would you run glxgears on your laptops for me and report the
frame rates?
13319 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2663.800 FPS
15475 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3095.000 FPS
15550 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3110.000 FPS
15505 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3101.000 FPS
This is from my desktop with a Nvidia GeForce4 Ti 4200 and I am using
the default 300x300 window size for glxgears. At 1280x1024 I get
239fps.
The commands on SuSE for good info are 3dinfo, glxinfo, and glxgears
from what I can quickly tell. Thanks for the feedback on your laptops
since just supporting 3D and doing it well make a difference for
modelling proteins and will affect my choices. I know the Dell Inspiron
with the Nvidia graphics is really nice, however it is a heavy expensive
desktop replacement laptop. Thanks,
Dow
Geoffrey wrote:
>Dow Hurst wrote:
>
>>I'm interested in getting a reasonably priced laptop but I need good
>>OpenGL performance to make it useful to me. I know that ATI now has
>>some drivers available for 3D under Linux but I trust the Nvidia
>>drivers alot more. I've never used the ATI drivers but most laptops,
>>especially the low cost ones are ATI driven or Intel integrated
>>graphics driven. Only the high end stuff seems to include Nvidia
>>chips. Does anyone have experience with the new ATI drivers? Are
>>they stable usable and with good performance?
>
>
>Hey Dow! I've got two laptops, my Sony, which I believe you've seen,
>that has an ATI 7500, uses Xorg and supports 3D, absolutely rock
>solid. I just picked up an hp pavilion ($500 after rebate at Circuit
>City, before Christmas sale). It has Intel Extreme Graphics 2 and it
>works quite well and supports 3D.
>
>I"ve tried the ATI drivers, but they didn't perform any better for me
>than Xorg, so I went back to the Xorg drivers.
>
Ale mailing list
Ale at ale.org
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale">http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00172" href="msg00172.html">[ale] Nvidia vs ATI on low cost laptops</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> esoteric at 3times25.net (Geoffrey)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00170.html">[ale] Nvidia vs ATI on low cost laptops</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00172.html">[ale] Nvidia vs ATI on low cost laptops</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00168.html">[ale] Nvidia vs ATI on low cost laptops</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00172.html">[ale] Nvidia vs ATI on low cost laptops</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00171"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00171"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>