[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ale] Speedfactory now requires mail contents
- To: ale at ale.org
- To: Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts <ale at ale.org>
- Subject: Re: [ale] Speedfactory now requires mail contents
- From: Christopher Fowler <cfowler at outpostsentinel.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 12:08:33 -0500
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 12:34:50 -0500 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: ehazna ng fcrrqsnpgbel.arg (ehazna) -->
- <!--x-message-id: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-subject: [ale] Speedfactory now requires mail contents to be readable -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 12:34:50 -0500</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: runman at speedfactory.net (runman)</li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] Speedfactory now requires mail contents to be readable</li>
- Cc: runman at speedfactory.net
> On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 11:06 -0500, Jerald Sheets wrote:
>
> > An aside here: You have Microsoft and clueless users to
> > thank for these types of policies. It is in
> > Speedfactory's best interest to do this type of
> > automated scanning, so as to escape culpability in the
> spread of viruses and trojans, as well as staying off
> > various blacklists hither and yon.
> >
>
> Exactly. I don't blame them. IMO if they detect the
> sender of MS origin then they should scan every bit of
> that email.
>
The topic here is Speedfactory's ineffective anti-virus
program. If you want to start a MS bashing thread please
have the courtesy of changing the subject.
Using MS does not equal spreading spam/virii just as using
Linux does not equal security. Also, why should someone use
a particular OS because of OS bigots as yourself who can't
understand the previous sentence ??? Using your logic I
could make the case that anyone who doesn't use OpenBSD (way
more secure than a default install of Linux) should be
denied access to the Internet. Besides - the topic here is
that an ISP who is following your principles of
"non-security" has in fact done the opposite - I am barred
from using security to protect my email from prying eyes.
Besides IF I HAD USED A NON-MS OS IT STILL WOULD HAVE
FAILED. The OS / mail client is not relevant here. C'mon -
focus people !
Software is neither evil nor good - it's people who
determine that.
I know this is a common trait of ALE - picking one
irrelevant thing in a post and starting a whole new thread /
flame war on that one little thing but it seems to me that
this has driven a lot of people off of this list as well as
diminishing motivation to participate in ALE (or even Open
Source) because of this compulsion many have of "making
mountains out of molehills".
Greg
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00365" href="msg00365.html">[ale] Speedfactory now requires mail contents to be readable</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> cfowler at outpostsentinel.com (Christopher Fowler)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00367" href="msg00367.html">[ale] Speedfactory now requires mail contents to be readable</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> jsheets at yahoo.com (Jerald Sheets)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00363.html">[ale] Speedfactory now requires mail contents to be readable</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00365.html">[ale] Speedfactory now requires mail contents to be readable</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00377.html">[ale] Speedfactory now requires mail contents to be readable</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00365.html">[ale] Speedfactory now requires mail contents to be readable</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00364"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00364"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>