[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain -->
- <!--x-date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 12:21:07 -0500 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: tert.serrzlre ng tznvy.pbz (Uert Terrzlre) -->
- <!--x-message-id: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-subject: [ale] Delivering ALE meetings on "Video" -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 12:21:07 -0500</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: greg.freemyer at gmail.com (Greg Freemyer)</li>
- <li><em>in-reply-to</em>: <<a href="msg00136.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>references</em>: <<a href="msg00070.html">[email protected]</a>> <<a href="msg00129.html">[email protected]</a>> <<a href="msg00131.html">[email protected]</a>> <<a href="msg00136.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] Delivering ALE meetings on "Video"</li>
Not sure of the details, but client one will get a segment from the
server, then make it available to clients 2 and 3 for P2P sharing.
The clients seem to randomly grab segments, so you don't have an issue
where they are all trying to get the same segments at the same time.
Also the clients know which segments the other clients have so they
will attempt to get segments from the other clients simultaneously
with trying to get one segment from the main server.
It is all rather elegant, but from a single downloaders perspective I
find downloading an ISO direct from a good fast site significantly
faster than trying to get it from a bittorrent swarm. Still I imagine
the cummulative download speed of a decent size swarm is more than a
typical server connection can provide.
Greg
--
Greg Freemyer
The Norcross Group
Forensics for the 21st Century
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00070" href="msg00070.html">[ale] ALE CENTRAL for Thurs., 12/8, 7:30pm: SCALIX</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> aaron at pd.org (aaron)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00129" href="msg00129.html">[ale] Delivering ALE meetings on "Video" (was ALE CENTRAL for Thurs., 12/8, 7:30pm: SCALIX)</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> aaron at pd.org (aaron)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00131" href="msg00131.html">[ale] Delivering ALE meetings on "Video" (was ALE CENTRAL for Thurs., 12/8, 7:30pm: SCALIX)</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> jkinney at localnetsolutions.com (James P. Kinney III)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00136" href="msg00136.html">[ale] Delivering ALE meetings on "Video"</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> aaron at pd.org (aaron)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00135.html">[ale] Disappointed, could not find SUSE 10.0 to buy this morning :(</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00138.html">[ale] Delivering ALE meetings on "Video" (was ALE CENTRAL forThurs., 12/8, 7:30pm: SCALIX)</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00136.html">[ale] Delivering ALE meetings on "Video"</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00133.html">[ale] Delivering ALE meetings on "Video" (was ALE CENTRAL for Thurs., 12/8, 7:30pm: SCALIX)</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00137"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00137"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>