[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain -->
- <!--x-date: Wed Apr 27 18:28:15 2005 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: ynlgbawo ng punegre.arg (Xrsserl P. Znlgba) -->
- <!--x-message-id: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-subject: [ale] Dual core CPUs in cluster? -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Wed Apr 27 18:28:15 2005</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: laytonjb at charter.net (Jeffrey B. Layton)</li>
- <li><em>in-reply-to</em>: <<a href="msg00728.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>references</em>: <<a href="msg00682.html">[email protected]</a>> <<a href="msg00728.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] Dual core CPUs in cluster?</li>
>However, the datasheets I have looked at show something I don't like,
>shared L1 and L2 cache. I don't recall if this is entirely accurate or
>not or if it was a "special" version. It seems to me that a shared L1 is
>asking for trouble. Shared L2 (the deepest data cache) would also be a
>problem as both core would not be working on the same data thus
>requiring a page out.
>
>
For the AMD dual-core the L1 and L2 caches are all separate.
There is a cross-bar in the chip though to help with memory
access requests, etc.
The Intel dual-cores are the same but don't have a crossbar
to help things. I've also read some rumors that in the next
generation, Intel will be adding a L3 cache and may have a
combined L2 cache across cores. If you can code for that
kind of architecture then codes that need to communicate
from core to core can just used the L2 to pass data. Theoretically
a good idea, but probably difficult to code for.
Jeff
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00740" href="msg00740.html">[ale] Dual core CPUs in cluster?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> Dow.Hurst at mindspring.com (Dow Hurst)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00744" href="msg00744.html">[ale] Dual core CPUs in cluster?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> jkinney at localnetsolutions.com (James P. Kinney III)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00682" href="msg00682.html">[ale] Dual core CPUs in cluster?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> Dow.Hurst at mindspring.com (Dow Hurst)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00728" href="msg00728.html">[ale] Dual core CPUs in cluster?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> jkinney at localnetsolutions.com (James P. Kinney III)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00731.html">[ale] I'm laughing on the floor!</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00733.html">[ale] I'm laughing on the floor!</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00728.html">[ale] Dual core CPUs in cluster?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00740.html">[ale] Dual core CPUs in cluster?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00732"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00732"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>