[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain -->
- <!--x-date: Fri Apr 15 10:02:03 2005 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: ppgubznf ng wbvznvy.pbz (Qbhegarl Fubznf) -->
- <!--x-message-id: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-subject: [ale] dd & unexpected soft update inconsistency, HUH ? -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Fri Apr 15 10:02:03 2005</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: ccthomas at joimail.com (Courtney Thomas)</li>
- <li><em>in-reply-to</em>: <<a href="msg00371.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>references</em>: <[email protected]> <<a href="msg00371.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] dd & unexpected soft update inconsistency, HUH ?</li>
I should have stated that I'm running for my network gateway server a
linux compatible version of FreeBSD-5.3, hence UFS not XFS.
I should have also said that my former mirroring was under 4.3 not 5.3
FreeBSD, again, with it's attendant linux compatibility.
Still, knowing all the above, it's incomprehensible that only /usr would
be corrupted in some way.
Cordially,
Courtney
On Fri, 2005-04-15 at 08:36, Greg Freemyer wrote:
> On 4/15/05, Courtney Thomas wrote:
> > I've been using dd for years to mirror my server HD without problems.
> >
> > The command used is: dd if=< original HD > of=< mirror HD >
> >
>
> I don't fully understand why, but with mounted filesystems this was
> known to cause filesystem corruption with XFS in the not too distant
> past.
>
> i.e. directly accessing the block device underlying a mounted XFS
> filesystem caused filesystem corruption due to incompatible buffering
> issues between the direct block access and the XFS filesystem access.
>
> I'm almost positive that even read-only access like the above
> triggered the issue and is why it was considered a significant
> problem.
>
> I don't know if any other Linux filesystems shared this issue, nor do
> I know if it was ever resolved in XFS. I don't even remember if this
> was 2.4 or 2.6.
>
> Greg
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00368" href="msg00368.html">[ale] dd & unexpected soft update inconsistency, HUH ?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> ccthomas at joimail.com (Courtney Thomas)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00371" href="msg00371.html">[ale] dd & unexpected soft update inconsistency, HUH ?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> greg.freemyer at gmail.com (Greg Freemyer)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00372.html">[ale] Perl + SMS</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00374.html">[ale] dd & unexpected soft update inconsistency, HUH ?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00371.html">[ale] dd & unexpected soft update inconsistency, HUH ?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00374.html">[ale] dd & unexpected soft update inconsistency, HUH ?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00373"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00373"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>