[no subject]

Why?

Is dump outdated now?

Is this going to be a problem later?

How does tar handle this? (I don't think it does ACL inode data either)

The system is a Centos 4 (so RedHat 4 with the NSA security modes)
-- 
James P. Kinney III          \Changing the mobile computing world/
CEO & Director of Engineering \          one Linux user         /
Local Net Solutions,LLC        \           at a time.          /
770-493-8244                    \.___________________________./
<a  rel="nofollow" href="http://www.localnetsolutions.com";>http://www.localnetsolutions.com</a>

GPG ID: 829C6CA7 James P. Kinney III (M.S. Physics)
&lt;jkinney at localnetsolutions.com&gt;
Fingerprint = 3C9E 6366 54FC A3FE BA4D 0659 6190 ADC3 829C 6CA7
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part



</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00167" href="msg00167.html">[ale] dump and ACL's</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> kaboom at oobleck.net (Chris Ricker)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00161.html">[ale] Burning CDs</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00163.html">&#x7B54;&#x590D;: [ale] dump and ACL's</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00160.html">[ale] Spamassassin help</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00167.html">[ale] dump and ACL's</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00162"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00162"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>

<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>